Digetydog wrote:In the past, Peruna’s Law would have struck and forced the team to pull defeat from the jaws of victory.

Bingo. It has happened often enough to us in the past that I was preparing for the worst. I actually felt something in my gut. I won't say I woulda puked, but things were starting to get very volatile along the digestive system. I almost didn't know how to react when the call went our way.

But hell yes! Big-time play at the goal line by Mitchell.

mrydel wrote:OMG
You know what? X Jones should have scored every time he ran with the ball. Sutton should have scored on every reception and Hicks should have scored every time he ran. But they did not so the score was closer than it should have been. But the score was correct.

I don’t know why everyone is so sensitive.

For the first time in God knows how long, the lucky breaks fell our way and we are now guaranteed a winning record.

In the past, Peruna’s Law would have struck and forced the team to pull defeat from the jaws of victory.

How about 'Peruna's law didn't work today'?

and of course - due to Peruna's law - this is the year they came off our schedule.

I think Peruna's Law was in effect for the Holiday Bowl and it was before that game.

Yes, Thought the same thing.

Larry Davis fell asleep and didn't box out. Not sure which is worse 1 missed block out to give up a tip in or 2 missed block outs run out the time - tho the outcome is still the same.

I never understood why Bliss didn't have Butch Moore take that final shot.

Was play the beginning of Peruna's Law and the SMU basketball curse?

I'd like to say to USC eat a [deleted]! [deleted] hate Peruna's law.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Peruna's Law and The Curse of the 5 seed would have been a bad combination.

Here's what I like:

Two things the talking heads always mention that are needed for a deep run are senior leadership and outstanding guard play.

Check....and check.


Add to that the tremendous chip our seniors must carry on their shoulders and the experience of winning more than 100 collegiate games.

Add to that the fact that any one of our starters can carry the team for a critical stretch.

Add to that the calm, cerebral way Jank approaches the game.

Add to that that it would F@@kin Kill Peruna's Law.


I like our team. $h!t happens but, with a good draw, I like our chances.

smusic 00 wrote:Is this the year Peruna's Law is found to be cruel and unusual?

Statute of Limitations expired?

Is this the year Peruna's Law is found to be cruel and unusual?

I am visualizing that old insurance man in the fishing outfit dangling the one dollar bill on a fishing line in front of his customer and pulling it away. Sad to think this way. Looking forward to Peruna's law being disproved.

I love the national pub like the next guy but .......
As a long time fan I've learned to live in fear of Peruna's Law.
So I'm tapping the brakes......

gostangs wrote:

SmooBoy wrote:I love how 4 years of success and facility facelift entitles us to have program smack-talk. How soon we forget just 5 seasons ago:

2011-12 SMU Men's Home Attendance

Home Dates..........Total Attendance..............Average
22 .................................43,337........................1,970

Well how long should it take before we are allowed to be proud of our current position? once you have it - you might as well smack talk it.

12.684 years to be exact. I would hate for bad voodoo to kick in Peruna's law with our recent (albeit impressive) success.

Stallion wrote:how does that not go in

Peruna's law lol