Re: You heard it here first...
Posted: Fri Oct 24, 2014 8:10 am
StallionsModelT wrote:So....why would SMU leak this story if indeed Mack is no longer in the running? Seems dumb.
To get people's attention.
StallionsModelT wrote:So....why would SMU leak this story if indeed Mack is no longer in the running? Seems dumb.
StallionsModelT wrote:So....why would SMU leak this story if indeed Mack is no longer in the running? Seems dumb.
smumustang1980 wrote:StallionsModelT wrote:So....why would SMU leak this story if indeed Mack is no longer in the running? Seems dumb.
Office politics drive many deals
mrydel wrote:Or gosh, maybe Mack Brown said no.
mrydel wrote:Or gosh, maybe Mack Brown said no.
StallionsModelT wrote:mrydel wrote:Or gosh, maybe Mack Brown said no.
Saying no to $32M would be a hard thing to do no matter how much money you've got.
smumustang1980 wrote:For what it's worth, it's fairly obvious that an important SMU insider wanted the DMN to report this story.
ponyinNC wrote:smumustang1980 wrote:For what it's worth, it's fairly obvious that an important SMU insider wanted the DMN to report this story.
i don't undertsand this...wish you would/could elaborate. I don't see how it is "obvious" - are you talking Hart, Ford, RGT?
Maybe I'm shortsighted, but why would an inisder the leak the story if ultimately Mack was going to decline the offer? Just to show that we are willing to pay that much? Are we trying to lure some bigger fish with that kind of figure?
Thanks.
ponyinNC wrote:smumustang1980 wrote:For what it's worth, it's fairly obvious that an important SMU insider wanted the DMN to report this story.
i don't undertsand this...wish you would/could elaborate. I don't see how it is "obvious" - are you talking Hart, Ford, RGT?
Maybe I'm shortsighted, but why would an inisder the leak the story if ultimately Mack was going to decline the offer? Just to show that we are willing to pay that much? Are we trying to lure some bigger fish with that kind of figure?
Thanks.