dr rc wrote:None of that matters and if it makes you feel better by all means twist yourself into a pretzel to call SMU WR U but just know that everyone else will be rolling their eyes at that just like this board would be doing if a school like UNT or Texas and A&M even was trying to claim WRU with the same amount of players making the NFL in the last 10.
I'm not the one who called us WRU but active or not does matter. Schools in P5 conferences are more likely to have players drafted because they have all the measurables, were big recruits in high school, but don't impress in college for whatever reason and NFL coaches will draft them and turn them into a project and then dump them. The average NFL career is short, so the fact that ours stick around is actually a pretty important distinction. I'd be curious to know how many other schools have 5 WR on rosters right now. That list can't be very long. There are what, 170 WR in the league right now? 3% of the league from a small program might not be WRU, but it isn't bad.
Name me the number of teams where both starting receivers come from the same college program?
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2018 3:56 pm