by Water Pony » Wed Jan 12, 2005 12:11 pm
Thanks, Nathan, for the post. I like the comment about the inverse relationship between academic progress/graduation rates and performance on the field or court.
I am a minority on this board, but, if there were rewards for doing it right, SMU has moved into the company of some wonderful institutions, only a few with strong, consistent athletic achievement, thereby putting SMU in the camp of:
Vanderbilt
Northwestern
Norte Dame
Stanford
Tulane
Rice
Duke
Service Academies
The truth is (to paraphae you) is we are not a state college, we will never be invited into the Cartel and we need to make lemonade from this lemon format. Ah, the Uncola! Supporting reform may be cynical by some but putting the emphasis on the right syl-a-bull can only help the private, non-BCS universities. When that happens we can compete and recruit against the Cartel.
Thanks for standing on That Wall, Colonel! Semper Fi
Pony Up