JustAFriend, you're killing me here. I like your posts and all, but how could you say this?:
"I like that all of the media hypes up Luke McCown like he is something, but Richard made him look stupid last year."
How many times did Bartel defend McCown? Zero. If he wasn't defending him, he certainly didn't make him "look stupid." If in fact McCown "looked stupid" that day, the credit should go to the SMU defense and defensive coaches. I don't personally think he looked stupid at all -- just had a bad day -- but everyone is entitled to his or her own opinion.
And before you go etching your buddy's name on the Heisman Trophy, remember that he had exactly one game (LaTech) in which he was really good. He was good, but certainly not sensational, in the rest of his starts -- and they were against some pretty weak defenses.
Don't get me wrong .... Bartel showed THE POTENTIAL last year to be a tremendous QB. But he is not there yet. I'm as avid an SMU fan as anyone alive, and I hope your buddy proves you right by re-writing the SMU passing record books. But to say that one game allows Bartel to make the nation's leading returning passer (who has been called a better pro prospect than his brother Josh - he of the NFL's Cardinals) look stupid is shortsighted and based on loyalty and friendship, rather than anything that's been done on the field. McCown should be the best quarterback in the WAC this year, and is among the best in the nation. What would he do if he had receivers like they have at USC, Florida State, Miami, etc.?
Remain faithful to Bartel as your friend. We're all loyal to him as our QB. But let's not get carried away .... just yet.