Is Urgency in Realignment Overstated?
Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2003 9:51 amAccording to reports out of Conference USA discussions yesterday, no member would leave before June of 2005.
<A HREF="http://www.usatoday.com/sports/college/2003-07-10-expansion_x.htm" TARGET=_blank>http://www.usatoday.com/sports/college/2003-07-10-expansion_x.htm</A>
Perhaps the urgency reported in papers in Tampa, Cincinnati, Louisville, Memphis, etc. is based on anxiety, not on a timeline which may be longer term than we have been discussing? Does ACC wait for number 12th? If we are patient, does that work to our benefit?
As a bunch of Type A's, can we play the game for the long term and give Bennett the opportunity to improve our chances with better results on the field?
<A HREF="http://www.usatoday.com/sports/college/2003-07-10-expansion_x.htm" TARGET=_blank>http://www.usatoday.com/sports/college/2003-07-10-expansion_x.htm</A>
Perhaps the urgency reported in papers in Tampa, Cincinnati, Louisville, Memphis, etc. is based on anxiety, not on a timeline which may be longer term than we have been discussing? Does ACC wait for number 12th? If we are patient, does that work to our benefit?
As a bunch of Type A's, can we play the game for the long term and give Bennett the opportunity to improve our chances with better results on the field?