PonyFans.comBoard IndexAround the HilltopFootballRecruitingBasketballOther Sports

Jenkins: \"Non-football powers seek NCAA reform\"

This is the forum for talk about SMU Football

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

Jenkins: \"Non-football powers seek NCAA reform\"

Postby NavyCrimson » Sun Jul 13, 2003 7:27 pm

Good article:

<A HREF="http://www.bayarea.com/mld/cctimes/sports/6293745.htm" TARGET=_blank>http://www.bayarea.com/mld/cctimes/sports/6293745.htm</A>

Posted on Sun, Jul. 13, 2003

Non-football powers seek NCAA reform
By Sally Jenkins

A civil war is taking shape in college athletics. On one side is Big Football, and on the other side is what might be called Little Football.

A major collision between the factions is coming, with a couple of possible outcomes: Either a genuine reform effort will finally take shape, or the NCAA as we know it will end.

The potential doomsday scenario became all too realistic last week with the Atlantic Coast Conference's hostile corporate raid on the Big East.

But that unsavory affair was just a symptom, not the cause. The real cause is the Bowl Championship Series (BCS) alliance, a rule-the-world cartel so ruinous and corrupt that it ought to be promptly dismantled by the NCAA -- a move toward which is underway, led by Little Football schools.

Little Football is a loose confederation of universities such as Tulane, colleges that choose to behave like colleges rather than conglomerates. According to Tulane president Scott Cowen, the leader of the rebellion, the BCS is not just wrong and destructive; it's probably illegal.

Since its inception in 1998, the BCS has effectively concentrated all of the money and power in college athletics in the hands of just 63 schools in six major conferences (the ACC, Pacific-10, Big Ten, Southeastern, Big 12 and Big East). It's effectively locked out the other five conferences and 53 schools that play Division I-A football from any chance of getting into the major postseason bowl games, with their massive financial pots.

Not one college from those conferences (the Western Athletic, Mountain West, Conference USA, Mid-American, Sunbelt) has gone to a BCS bowl. As The New York Times has noted, BCS revenue from the 2002-03 season was $114 million, and more than $109 million of that went solely to the BCS colleges.

The others got backwash.

A couple of weeks ago, Cowen sent a letter to his fellow NCAA Division I-A presidents protesting the BCS system and asking them to join him in a conference call to discuss ways to attack it. He figures the time is ripe because the BCS contract expires after the football season in 2005. Cowen says, "We have about 12 months to make the compelling case that a system that has divided Division I-A football into two camps -- haves and have-nots -- and essentially prevents 53 universities from competing for a national championship, should be dismantled."

Cowen figured if he heard back from 10 other presidents, that would be a good start.

Thirty-three of them responded. More replies are coming in every day.

Colleges with disgraceful graduation rates hoard the money from postseason play. (Tennessee's football graduation rate in 2001 was 8 percent, and Oklahoma's football graduation rate for the same year was just 6 percent, according to the 2002 NCAA Graduation-Rates Report. Tulane's was 82 percent).

But Big Football has become so financially predatory that it's even turning on itself. Anyone who watched the ACC's raid on the Big East had the sensation of watching a python devour its own tail. The raid, resulting in the defection of Miami and Virginia Tech, instantly ruined the Big East financially and stripped it to six Division I football colleges, jeopardizing its membership in the BCS.

The BCS was created in '98 by former SEC commissioner Roy Kramer and ACC commissioner John Swofford, who will go down in history as Terminator I and Terminator II of college sports. The BCS has been corrosive to all collegiate games, across the board, not just football: Non-BCS schools now have smaller athletic budgets, fewer recruiting resources, poorer facilities, lower staff salaries and ever-rising deficits. As the Times pointed out, it's no coincidence that in three of the last four years, 14 of the 16 teams in the round of 16 in the NCAA men's basketball tournament were from BCS schools.

How can BCS colleges, in the name of higher education, bring about the wholesale destruction of college football?

They can't and still call themselves institutions of learning under the law. Profit-sharing has long been a central tenet of the NCAA: The organization is no stronger than its weakest member, and its central mission is supposed to be not for profit. Its not-for-profit status is all that protects it from antitrust challenges, taxation and labor law. Define the NCAA as a business and suddenly the players are entitled to salaries and labor protections, and those bowl payouts are unrelated business income in the eyes of the IRS.

Instead, under the BCS rule, the NCAA has degenerated into a system of Big Football intentionally trying to kill off Little Football to keep all of the profits.

Why the NCAA allowed the BCS to be created is a good question. The fact is, the NCAA has been in an awkward position because "it feared that if it asserted its authority the big football schools would break off from the NCAA," Cowen says. But maybe that wouldn't be such a bad thing.

In the meantime, the BCS will continue to threaten the financial well being of smaller football programs struggling to retain Division I-A status. Cowen has scheduled the conference call of 33 college presidents for July 22. NCAA president Myles Brand has said he may monitor it.

He needs to.
BRING BACK THE GLORY DAYS OF SMU FOOTBALL!!!

For some strange reason, one of the few universities that REFUSE to use their school colors: Harvard Crimson & Yale Blue.
User avatar
NavyCrimson
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 3139
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2000 3:01 am
Location: Simi Valley-CA (Hm of the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library)

Re: Jenkins: \"Non-football powers seek NCAA reform\"

Postby Charleston Pony » Sun Jul 13, 2003 7:34 pm

Cowen appears determined and the upcoming teleconference on 7/22 promises to be very interesting. Anyone taking bets on whether the BCS survives...or whether we see an 8 or 16 team playoff in I-A soon?

<A HREF="http://www.orlandosentinel.com/sports/columnists/orl-sptbianchi13071303jul13,0,1737419.column?coll=orl-sports-headlines" TARGET=_blank>http://www.orlandosentinel.com/sports/columnists/orl-sptbianchi13071303jul13,0,1737419.column?coll=orl-sports-headlines</A>
Charleston Pony
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 27459
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2000 3:01 am
Location: Stonebridge Golf Club, NC

Re: Jenkins: \"Non-football powers seek NCAA reform\"

Postby fan » Sun Jul 13, 2003 9:10 pm

An 8 team playoff wouldn't really solve anything. It would be a step in the right direction but there needs to be 16 teams.
fan
Varsity
 
Posts: 324
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2003 3:01 am

Re: Jenkins: \"Non-football powers seek NCAA reform\"

Postby NavyCrimson » Mon Jul 14, 2003 3:14 am

that's a great article, cp...a must read by the orlando sentinel again!

[This message has been edited by Navy&Crimson (edited 07-14-2003).]

[This message has been edited by Navy&Crimson (edited 07-14-2003).]
BRING BACK THE GLORY DAYS OF SMU FOOTBALL!!!

For some strange reason, one of the few universities that REFUSE to use their school colors: Harvard Crimson & Yale Blue.
User avatar
NavyCrimson
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 3139
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2000 3:01 am
Location: Simi Valley-CA (Hm of the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library)


Return to Football

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 100 guests