Re: Mark Hudspeth
Posted: Sun Oct 06, 2013 10:33 pm
SMU_Alumni11 wrote:At this point how many solid ( BCS offers) 3* do we have like one or two...
Who do have 3 players who all were on scholarship at UT.........
SMU_Alumni11 wrote:At this point how many solid ( BCS offers) 3* do we have like one or two...
BenW wrote:Hudspeth loads up with Miss JCs and players who aren't qualified on signing date. He's taking advantage of the SEC rule about no-oversigning. Last year he got burned some, as probably 2/3 of the top of his class didn't qualify; but the prior year it worked (and it still worked some last year).
Stallion wrote:BenW wrote:Hudspeth loads up with Miss JCs and players who aren't qualified on signing date. He's taking advantage of the SEC rule about no-oversigning. Last year he got burned some, as probably 2/3 of the top of his class didn't qualify; but the prior year it worked (and it still worked some last year).
something to think about and probably very true. SMU can get just about every full qualifier in-heck we've gotten about 3 non-qualifiers in the last 2 years in Basketball, but there is an advantage that state schools have that SMU can't do-NOT because Turner hates athletics-but because of NCAA rules. A non-qualifier that is admitted to a state school can walk on by paying in-state tuition and if he performs satisfactorily in first year can join the team after sitting out first year. This is a big advantage for state schools in Louisiana, Mississippi with high concentration of poor academically performing students. Not Turners fault because tuition is $57,000
couch 'em wrote:I am for a proven coach at any cost. But I don't write the checks. If we have to go up and comer, what about Hudspeth? Currently at ULaLa. Great winning percentage.
redpony wrote:IMO 3*s with a couple of BCS offers are the 'bottom of the barrell'. We need to aim much higher and hopefully we will get a coach who agrees and can really step up our recruiting.
Most of our current players play hard and to the best of their ability but they are just outclassed when you try to compete with BCS schools ala TT, TCU, Baylor and A$M.
MustangStealth wrote:Before we get too high on him, let's keep in mind a few things.
His only 3 wins against non-conference FBS teams with winning records are in the 3 New Orleans Bowl games (0-7 in the regular season)
24 of his 30 wins at Ul-Laf are against Sunbelt or FCS teams
0-7 against the P5
Go ahead and dog pile me, since I know it's coming, but we should aim higher than "best coach in the Sunbelt".
BenW wrote:The other problem is that while SMU coaches may be free to recruit minimal qualifiers, they still have to pass the SMU classes. I'm not a SMU guy, but I can reasonably assume that there are few completely BS classes at SMU. So the coaches probably do have to screen those with the minimal qualifications and find out which ones they think are really smarter than their ACT and can handle the curriculum. Some schools use things like BYU correspondence courses to keep players eligible (I'm hearing Liberty is getting into that business as well), but I doubt SMU sinks that low.
Hudspeth has a much freer reign at ULL.