At least that is the word from the other site that cannot be named here.
WDWHA
We have white smoke
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
16 posts
• Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
We have white smoke
by mrydel » Tue Apr 15, 2014 8:50 pm
All those who believe in psycho kinesis, raise my hand
-
mrydel 
- Posts: 31993
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Sherwood,AR,USA
Re: We have white smoke
by DanFreibergerForHeisman » Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:29 pm
Clever.
Shake It Off Moody
-
DanFreibergerForHeisman - Posts: 16484
- Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2000 3:01 am
- Location: The 214
Re: We have white smoke
by PSCA » Tue Apr 15, 2014 10:48 pm
Yes, Pope got another year. That word came down a few days ago. Good for him and great for the "Stangs".
- PSCA
- Posts: 672
- Joined: Thu May 31, 2012 2:19 pm
Re: We have white smoke
by JoeKidd » Wed Apr 16, 2014 3:03 am
ojaipony wrote:Good news. And he needs to play LB.
Great news and agreed he needs to stay on the defensive side of the ball. I think we will be fine at RB and potentially Gresham can play as a true Frosh.
#1 Day At A Time
-
JoeKidd 
- Posts: 1683
- Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2011 7:41 am
Re: We have white smoke
by Harry0569 » Wed Apr 16, 2014 10:02 am
Gr8 newz
"smupony94: Harry, you have been promoted to purveyor of official status capabilities."
-
Harry0569 - Posts: 8938
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2008 12:35 pm
- Location: Atlanta, GA
Re: We have white smoke
by JasonB » Wed Apr 16, 2014 10:58 am
Honestly, if he doesn't play LB it is a great sign of how well Horton/JUCO LB and Yenga look inside. So I kind of hope he doesn't play LB.
- JasonB
- Posts: 7130
- Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2001 3:01 am
- Location: Allen, Tx, USA
Re: We have white smoke
by Junior » Wed Apr 16, 2014 11:00 am
what has given you the impression that we are fine at RB?JoeKidd wrote:ojaipony wrote:Good news. And he needs to play LB.
Great news and agreed he needs to stay on the defensive side of the ball. I think we will be fine at RB and potentially Gresham can play as a true Frosh.
Derail the Frogs!
-
Junior - Posts: 11513
- Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 11:56 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
Re: We have white smoke
by Big12Mustang » Wed Apr 16, 2014 11:04 am
Junior wrote:what has given you the impression that we are fine at RB?JoeKidd wrote:ojaipony wrote:Good news. And he needs to play LB.
Great news and agreed he needs to stay on the defensive side of the ball. I think we will be fine at RB and potentially Gresham can play as a true Frosh.
A great Oline will make any running back look great, and a crappy Oline will make running backs look like garbage.
It all depends on the line...which was not good last year. Hopefully we are better and more experienced this year.
-
Big12Mustang 
- Posts: 2224
- Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2014 12:41 am
- Location: Uptown Dallas, TX
Re: We have white smoke
by malonish » Wed Apr 16, 2014 3:10 pm
We need a line for Line,P.
Leader of the Band-itos.
Mustangsabu wrote:
Malonish! You are the man!
PonyPride:
I think malonish is right
peruna81:
God bless you, malonish.
Mustangsabu wrote:
Malonish! You are the man!
PonyPride:
I think malonish is right
peruna81:
God bless you, malonish.
-
malonish - Posts: 3750
- Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 1:42 am
- Location: Nope
Re: We have white smoke
by mrydel » Wed Apr 16, 2014 3:28 pm
My guess is that if you want to name an opening day RB now, you have to go P.
All those who believe in psycho kinesis, raise my hand
-
mrydel - Posts: 31993
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Sherwood,AR,USA
Re: We have white smoke
by Big12Mustang » Wed Apr 16, 2014 3:30 pm
malonish wrote:We need a line for Line,P.
Line, P. needs the line to be good
-
Big12Mustang - Posts: 2224
- Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2014 12:41 am
- Location: Uptown Dallas, TX
16 posts
• Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 98 guests