Page 1 of 2

CFP: Richer, Except One

PostPosted: Tue May 05, 2015 10:14 am
by HarvCrimYaleBlue
The graph below pretty well says it all:

Image

Complete story for your amusement:

http://www.foxsports.com/college-footba ... one-050415

Re: CFP: Richer, Except One

PostPosted: Tue May 05, 2015 10:21 am
by RGV Pony
Lol.. So CUSA got more.. Jokes on us

Re: CFP: Richer, Except One

PostPosted: Tue May 05, 2015 10:39 am
by ojaipony
One year outlier from how I understand it. CUSA won't make more money going forward.

Re: CFP: Richer, Except One

PostPosted: Tue May 05, 2015 11:07 am
by fifty
Shout out to John Marinato

Re: CFP: Richer, Except One

PostPosted: Tue May 05, 2015 1:04 pm
by NTXCoog
But that's Playoff distribution only. Total payouts still higher in AAC.

Re: CFP: Richer, Except One

PostPosted: Tue May 05, 2015 1:32 pm
by Pony Boss
NTXCoog wrote:But that's Playoff distribution only. Total payouts still higher in AAC.

That's right, this doesn't include TV rev which is the highest out of the other 4 leftover conferences.

Re: CFP: Richer, Except One

PostPosted: Tue May 05, 2015 1:51 pm
by StallionsModelT
The AAC brought in the most revenue of the non P5 conferences.

Re: CFP: Richer, Except One

PostPosted: Tue May 05, 2015 2:16 pm
by Planter's Punch
Not shocking, we all new the rift was coming

Re: CFP: Richer, Except One

PostPosted: Tue May 05, 2015 6:14 pm
by CalallenStang
RGV Pony wrote:Lol.. So CUSA got more.. Jokes on us


CUSA also has more teams to split it

Re: CFP: Richer, Except One

PostPosted: Tue May 05, 2015 7:28 pm
by sbsmith
Power Conference

Re: CFP: Richer, Except One

PostPosted: Tue May 05, 2015 10:13 pm
by NTXCoog
No offense, but teams like SMU and UConn contributed to this since part of the equation is conference strength. We need more teams improving at the top end too, but having teams in the bottom 10-20 really affects payouts. Hopefully SMU turns it around soon which will lift the whole conference's rating if everyone else at a minimum maintains.

Re: CFP: Richer, Except One

PostPosted: Wed May 06, 2015 11:52 am
by sbsmith
NTXCoog wrote:No offense, but teams like SMU and UConn contributed to this since part of the equation is conference strength. We need more teams improving at the top end too, but having teams in the bottom 10-20 really affects payouts. Hopefully SMU turns it around soon which will lift the whole conference's rating if everyone else at a minimum maintains.



The conference needs that G5 access bowl bid. AAC types said the conference was so strong that the bid was all but assured. What happened?

Re: CFP: Richer, Except One

PostPosted: Wed May 06, 2015 8:54 pm
by PonySnob
[quote="sbsmith"]Power Conference[/quote
Power Bottom

Re: CFP: Richer, Except One

PostPosted: Wed May 06, 2015 9:32 pm
by smupony94
SMU is a top

Re: CFP: Richer, Except One

PostPosted: Wed May 06, 2015 9:37 pm
by fifty
We needed Boise St. We weren't even close to an access bowl last year given the existence of Boise, Colorado State, and Marshall. Sad