Page 1 of 1

Jordan Carmouche at Armed Forces Bowl

PostPosted: Sat Dec 22, 2018 5:06 pm
by Donnell88
Former SMU linebacker Jordan Carmouche, who transferred to Houston after his freshman season, looks rather ordinary against Army, who are leading 42-7 late in the first half.

Re: Jordan Carmouche at Armed Forces Bowl

PostPosted: Sat Dec 22, 2018 6:33 pm
by PonyPride
63-7 with 8 minutes to go.

Re: Jordan Carmouche at Armed Forces Bowl

PostPosted: Sat Dec 22, 2018 7:05 pm
by PonyPride
Final: 70-14

Re: Jordan Carmouche at Armed Forces Bowl

PostPosted: Sat Dec 22, 2018 7:23 pm
by Water Pony
Should Army be invited to the AAC? Seems like a natural.

Re: Jordan Carmouche at Armed Forces Bowl

PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2018 9:38 am
by Roach
I like the idea. If nothing else, the Army-Navy game would do wonders for attendance/visibility.

Always wanted to go to a game at West Point. I'd make that trip.

Re: Jordan Carmouche at Armed Forces Bowl

PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2018 9:48 am
by mrydel
Until they eliminate cut blocking I would not like playing 2 triple option teams a year. We are always too thin on the OL and do not need to increase the odds of losing more.

Re: Jordan Carmouche at Armed Forces Bowl

PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2018 10:10 am
by Roach
mrydel wrote:Until they eliminate cut blocking I would not like playing 2 triple option teams a year. We are always too thin on the OL and do not need to increase the odds of losing more.

Or DL ... :wink:

That's a good point. Or, on the other hand, it might help defend Navy better, since we'd have to face the triple option more than once a year.

Re: Jordan Carmouche at Armed Forces Bowl

PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2018 11:55 am
by mustangxc
I would prefer to drop Navy and add BYU.

Re: Jordan Carmouche at Armed Forces Bowl

PostPosted: Tue Dec 25, 2018 12:48 am
by sacklunch
mrydel wrote:Until they eliminate cut blocking I would not like playing 2 triple option teams a year. We are always too thin on the OL and do not need to increase the odds of losing more.


We should run the triple option. Not sure why more teams don’t in college football.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Re: Jordan Carmouche at Armed Forces Bowl

PostPosted: Tue Dec 25, 2018 2:54 pm
by Charleston Pony
We have 12 members for both football and bball with Navy and Wichita State, respectively. Army & Navy don't want to give up their $$$ game and IIRC, Navy made a deal where they don't share any of that revenue with other AAC teams. Not sure BYU would want to play in a conference with nobody in their time zone, but it might help late season scheduling. Not sure Navy would want to have to go back to Indy scheduling, either. Our conference works pretty well as is and while Army is in an "up cycle", Navy has dominated them in the recent past.

Re: Jordan Carmouche at Armed Forces Bowl

PostPosted: Thu Dec 27, 2018 10:26 am
by PoconoPony
mrydel wrote:Until they eliminate cut blocking I would not like playing 2 triple option teams a year. We are always too thin on the OL and do not need to increase the odds of losing more.


A number of years ago I had the chance to spend some time with then Pitt coach Dave Wansteadt. I asked him about his forthcoming game with Navy. He commented that he never looked forward to Navy because he would always lose 3 linemen for extended periods of time if not the rest of the season because of the cut blocking.

Re: Jordan Carmouche at Armed Forces Bowl

PostPosted: Thu Dec 27, 2018 10:40 am
by JasonB
Navy isn't the problem It is the type of blocking they execute that induces so many injuries.

With all of the rules changes enacted to help keep players healthy, cut blocking should be next on the list.

However, nothing is going to get done unless the members of their conference complain about it...