PonyFans.com

Dukie wrote:Meanwhile, Sherrington thinks we may have spring football:

Spring football has always seemed like a good idea.

We could just watch the AAF.

Whoops.

Good thing we have the XFL.

Oh.

About 19,800 results (0.50 seconds)







Search Results
Web results

WHO: Asymptomatic Virus Transmission 'Very Rare' - Newsmax
www.newsmax.com › 2020/06/08

Jun 8, 2020 - "From the data we have, it still seems to be rare that an asymptomatic person actually ... And they're not finding secondary transmission onward.
Missing: evidence ‎| Must include: evidence
COVID-19 alert
Common questions

Is there asymptomatic transmission of the coronavirus disease?


How long is it between when a person is exposed to the virus and when they start showing symptoms?


What should I do if I have had close contact with someone who has COVID-19 and I cannot get tested?


What do I do if I’ve been exposed to someone who tested positive for COVID-19?

For informational purposes only. Consult your local medical authority for health advice.


Feedback
Web results

Fact Check: Did WHO Say That Asymptomatic COVID-19 Cases
thelogicalindian.com › Fact Check

Claim: WHO stated that asymptomatic COVID-19 cases rarely spread the disease.
Claimed by: Social Media posts
Fact check by The Logical Indian: True

Feedback

The WHO has backed off that position, I think, BUS.

https://www.statnews.com/2020/06/09/who ... -covid-19/

“The majority of transmission that we know about is that people who have symptoms transmit the virus to other people through infectious droplets,” Van Kerkhove said. “But there are a subset of people who don’t develop symptoms, and to truly understand how many people don’t have symptoms, we don’t actually have that answer yet.”

Ponyboy is correct. Statement is more of an unknown quantity than a "No it ain't happnin" and was a miscommunication at first. Another quote in the article talks about how people are most infectious in the pre-symptomatic phase before they really start to feel like doo doo.

mr. pony wrote:

Greenwich Pony wrote:I hate to point this out, but if it's not safe for the bands, it is certainly not safe for the football players. I know this is all about the money, but if you are unwilling to risk band members lives (and why would you want to?) then you can't risk athletes' lives either.

Nobody’s LIVES will be in danger, Nancy.
(What, you read The DMN a lot?)

If you’re under 70 with no underlying issues, your chance of dying from coronavirus is barely above zero .

Well aren't you a charming breath of fresh air, lol.

Well he aint wrong. Except for some of the alumni band I guess - some of them look 90.

mr. pony wrote:

Greenwich Pony wrote:I hate to point this out, but if it's not safe for the bands, it is certainly not safe for the football players. I know this is all about the money, but if you are unwilling to risk band members lives (and why would you want to?) then you can't risk athletes' lives either.

Nobody’s LIVES will be in danger, Nancy.
(What, you read The DMN a lot?)

If you’re under 70 with no underlying issues, your chance of dying from coronavirus is barely above zero .

Wrong, with a garnish of racism. Like parsley.

gostangs wrote:Well he aint wrong. Except for some of the alumni band I guess - some of them look 90.

Oh he's very, very wrong.

Dukie wrote:

gostangs wrote:Well he aint wrong. Except for some of the alumni band I guess - some of them look 90.

Oh he's very, very wrong.

From the leftist magazine the Atlantic.....

If the latest surge is concentrated among younger Americans, that would partly explain the declining death count. Young people are much less likely to die from this disease, even if they face other health risks. International data from South Korea, Spain, China, and Italy suggest that the COVID-19 case-fatality rate for people older than 70 is more than 100 times greater than for those younger than 40.

100X greater is an almost unheard of statistical difference. He is correct