The Athletic: College football breakout team candidates

[Dukie]

So, to summarize the last few posts, SMU in contention for the AAC championship (I may have glossed over a few things).

Heh, with a fun side issue that had nothing to do with this topic, but was very important to someone.

[CJPONY16]

So, to summarize the last few posts, SMU in contention for the AAC championship (I may have glossed over a few things).

Heh, with a fun side issue that had nothing to do with this topic, but was very important to someone.

Yet you're the one who just cant quit talking crap, even after you attempted to sign off if your own little way.

[mustangxc]

LET IT GO!!!!

[EastStang]

Save the vaccine issue for the Cole Beasley thread. The question is whether we bet the over since the betting line is at 6.5.

[ponyboy]

If I was a betting man, I’d bet the over. We may be wildly over, but I think 7 wins is very reasonable.

[Dukie]

So, to summarize the last few posts, SMU in contention for the AAC championship (I may have glossed over a few things).

Heh, with a fun side issue that had nothing to do with this topic, but was very important to someone.

Yet you're the one who just cant quit talking crap, even after you attempted to sign off if your own little way.

I admitted I was wrong. Because it wasn't clear enough for you, I'll reiterate and expand: I am really, really uneducated when it comes to gambling. I don't gamble. I also didn't click through on the link, and had no idea the win-total over/under mentioned wasn't the author's prediction. Boy, did I faceplant.

Now please go get the idiots posting anti-vax stuff to admit their errors, in line with the equivalency *you* insisted on? And I'm sure you'll have more to say about my overly sharp tone, my comity-building, easy-going, not-angry friend.

[Charleston Pony]

If I was a betting man, I’d bet the over. We may be wildly over, but I think 7 wins is very reasonable.

Agree. A very tempting bet, but until this group proves they can win in November...

[CJPONY16]

Heh, with a fun side issue that had nothing to do with this topic, but was very important to someone.

Yet you're the one who just cant quit talking crap, even after you attempted to sign off if your own little way.

I admitted I was wrong. Because it wasn't clear enough for you, I'll reiterate and expand: I am really, really uneducated when it comes to gambling. I don't gamble. I also didn't click through on the link, and had no idea the win-total over/under mentioned wasn't the author's prediction. Boy, did I faceplant.

Now please go get the idiots posting anti-vax stuff to admit their errors, in line with the equivalency *you* insisted on? And I'm sure you'll have more to say about my overly sharp tone, my comity-building, easy-going, not-angry friend.

I apologize if it seemed like I was asking you to rehash the original argument. I wasn't. Lets do ourselves, and everyone here a favor and drop it.

I am not a gambler either, so we have that in common.