Re: Bowl Games
Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2023 10:58 am
redpony wrote:Mustangs_Maroons wrote:I also think what USC was able to do this year with the transfers was akin to pillaging schools (mostly Oklahoma) to achieve immediate success. Glad they didn’t win a bowl to reward what the NCAA now allows these really rich teams with new coaches to do. They basically bought their team this year with no payroll limitation and no transfer restrictions. They’ll keep doing that and will probably buy more players in the D side to match the talent they’re getting on the offensive side.
yep- that is what NIL is all about.. are we any different? lots of posts suggesting that we donate to be able to buy better players. kind of like the pot calling the kettle black.
BTW- had to laugh the comment about USC- students rich, spoiled and arrogant. Seems like those same labels have been applied to our students as well. Not a fan of cal. universities other than Stanford and Cal. Tech.
Yes; USC and SMU have many similarities student body and alumni wise. USC has just placed more emphasis on athletics than SMU