FroggieFever wrote:Topper wrote:Because you constantly claim inside knowledge or attendance re high level discussions but you refuse to name names, dates, places or times. You contradict very direct and unequivocal statements by the president of a university as "silliness" but you won't or can't describe your authority. In other words your comments may be entertaining but they convey no meaningful or substantiated information.
Ignoring the first sentence abv, let us get back on topic. You asked for a quote. I gave you one. Simplified, it suggests "ehhhhh we will wait and see what is best for us" and in no way suggests unity. Regardless, as it pertains to SMU, we will be just fine and end up in a better place than we are now.
FYI: You are obviously more than welcome to ignore my posts. (Click my name, then click "add foe.")
Hey, you finally posted something positive about SMU! (Other than the "Pony Up" tag.)
As one with a name taken from another school--but not SMU's chief rival--I will say that it's somewhat remarkable to me that you are dumbfounded about how your many, many posts sagely foretelling the demise of the PAC 12 as the Big 12 eagerly swallows up most/all of the Four Corners schools somehow don't come off with any of the "hey fellow Mustangs" bonhomie you assume should be the case. This disconnect is magnified, of course, by your screen name, your photo, and, well, the fact that your alleged insider knowledge happens to align perfectly with the propaganda that Big 12 mouthpieces are spewing anywhere and everywhere, and paying consulting firms to amplify.
Anyway, how will SMU be just fine and end up in a better place, in your view?
PS I've seen folks here vouch for you to be a good guy. I haven't seen anyone vouch for you being in the room for TCU and Big 12 meetings with Arizona and ASU.