BCS changes?

by **Charleston Pony** » Mon Apr 26, 2004 6:36 am

let's hope they add a 5th bowl to give us "litle guys" a chance. As for the national championship debate, how about starting by saying you have to win your conference championship to be eligible for the national title? That would have helped last year...and I believe there was another year that Nebraska went to the title game after losing the Big XII Championship game.

http://www.cbs.sportsline.com/collegefo ... ry/7282809

by **BUS** » Mon Apr 26, 2004 7:25 am

How about this REAL HIGH standard

50 % graduation rate. That is a high goal worth of consideration.

by **Charleston Pony** » Mon Apr 26, 2004 5:59 pm

the truth hurts. the "have nots" are what we are for a reason.

Gotta be a way to include any non-BCS school that manages to go unbeaten...especially if they've beaten another top 25 team. I've got to believe there would be interest in watching Cinderella against the Big Boys, but I agree the non-BCS schools should not have a seat at the table just because we also play at the I-A level. Let's face it...an unbeaten TCU team last year would have drawn some interest, but a one loss TCU is just another "have not" that most could care less about.

http://www.cbs.sportsline.com/collegefo ... ry/7285353

by **BUS** » Tue Apr 27, 2004 8:14 am

BUS wrote:How about this REAL HIGH standard

50 % graduation rate. That is a high goal worthy of consideration.

BCS changes?

BCS changes?

Re:

Who is online