Broadcasters
Posted: Sat Jan 31, 2015 11:16 pm
Any idea as to why the broadcasters were were not sitting court side tonight? In other games that W has attended, they still sat in their usual seats.
DanFreibergerForHeisman wrote:Somebody (I believe mrydel) mentioned ESPN has been doing more games lately with announcers in Bristol.
I don't think it had anything to do with W being in the house.
NY Pony wrote:DanFreibergerForHeisman wrote:Somebody (I believe mrydel) mentioned ESPN has been doing more games lately with announcers in Bristol.
I don't think it had anything to do with W being in the house.
http://www.espnfrontrow.com/2014/11/esp ... oductions/
They've been trying it out. All of the games have been on ESPN 3, U or News. Nothing on ESPN 2 or the mothership.
PonyPride wrote:Confirmed: the game was called by announcers in Bristol. Apparently they have done about 50 games (estimate) from Bristol this year, the theory being that they could have one crew call two or maybe even three games in a single day. All about saving money, it seems.
Midcourt seats, where announcers normally sit, were occupied by Secret Service.
PonyPride wrote:Confirmed: the game was called by announcers in Bristol. Apparently they have done about 50 games (estimate) from Bristol this year, the theory being that they could have one crew call two or maybe even three games in a single day. All about saving money, it seems.
Midcourt seats, where announcers normally sit, were occupied by Secret Service.
RebStang wrote:The problem that I've seen is that the "remote announcers" miss things because they're not actually there. Part of the job of a TV announcer is to give the audience a feel for what's going on in the arena... kind of hard to do that if you're not actually in the arena.
RebStang wrote:PonyPride wrote:Confirmed: the game was called by announcers in Bristol. Apparently they have done about 50 games (estimate) from Bristol this year, the theory being that they could have one crew call two or maybe even three games in a single day. All about saving money, it seems.
Midcourt seats, where announcers normally sit, were occupied by Secret Service.
The problem that I've seen is that the "remote announcers" miss things because they're not actually there. Part of the job of a TV announcer is to give the audience a feel for what's going on in the arena... kind of hard to do that if you're not actually in the arena.
lwjr wrote:RebStang wrote:PonyPride wrote:Confirmed: the game was called by announcers in Bristol. Apparently they have done about 50 games (estimate) from Bristol this year, the theory being that they could have one crew call two or maybe even three games in a single day. All about saving money, it seems.
Midcourt seats, where announcers normally sit, were occupied by Secret Service.
The problem that I've seen is that the "remote announcers" miss things because they're not actually there. Part of the job of a TV announcer is to give the audience a feel for what's going on in the arena... kind of hard to do that if you're not actually in the arena.
I'm afraid this is the wave of the future for broadcast games that do not have a national appeal. Cheaper to produce means higher revenue
CalallenStang wrote:Failing to see how it's higher revenue