SMUstangs22 wrote:The MAJOR issue not many are talking about it the possibility of transfers tanking our APR. That could result in a second post season ban.
As long as they are in proper academic standing when they transfer, it won't hurt your APR.
|
Why SMU did not fire LBModerators: PonyPride, SmooPower
26 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Re: Why SMU did not fire LB
As long as they are in proper academic standing when they transfer, it won't hurt your APR.
Re: Why SMU did not fire LBBottom line is that we frequently get into trouble over kids who are marginal and/or who are not academic qualifiers. There were big battles on this board a few year back when JJ kept trying to sneak in kids who were not qualifiers and then place the blame on SMU and the fall out from kids not admitted then showing up for summer practice. We could eliminate 80% of our problems by just setting the academic standards for the coaches to understand and then recruit accordingly. Seems like we seldom hear about academic issues with Duke, Vanderbilt, Northwestern, Stanford, Boston College, Wake Forest which are institutions with whom we should compare. We appear to have the inferiority complex that we need to do anything including the recruitment of academically unqualified kids in order to compete.
Re: Why SMU did not fire LB
Jank would run circles around Underwood...wtf? Jank is very well thought of around the country....he is committed to SMU, or at least was until this week.
Re: Why SMU did not fire LBI sure hope Jank stays. I'm really interested in seeing how he will do if/when he takes over this program.
Re: Why SMU did not fire LBWe will see how Jank does against Michigan and Stanford with a talented SMU team (if nobody has transferred).
Last edited by Rebel10 on Sun Oct 04, 2015 4:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
#HammerDown
Re: Why SMU did not fire LBI think Jank will be great. There has been no reason for me to think otherwise just yet.
Re: Why SMU did not fire LBLast Saturday, before the bomb hit, I was talking to Nic and asked him about playing under self.
He said something along the lines of "he's great. But it wasn't new, the way he coached and things he said were just like....jank." I assumed he was going to say LB.
Re: Why SMU did not fire LB
Duke, Vanderbilt, Stanford and Northwestern are in a different league academically than SMU. I'm a proud SMU alum but I tire of some of the unrealistic "academic peer" associations I see brought up on this board as they are more often than not wishful thinking. SMU is academically similar to private schools like Tulane, Boston College, Tulsa, BYU and maybe Wake Forrest.
Re: Why SMU did not fire LB
You missed the point. Point is that we must recruit academically qualified kids and still compete.
Re: Why SMU did not fire LBeverybody has to raise their standards this year especially in Basketball-its going to be of less importance from now on.
"With a quarter of a tank of gas, we can get everything we need right here in DFW." -SMU Head Coach Chad Morris
When momentum starts rolling downhill in recruiting-WATCH OUT.
Re: Why SMU did not fire LB
Turner is all in and that is what has kept me going
26 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 37 guests |
|