WAC
Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2003 11:00 pmIt doesnt look good when your lone representative is a #13 seed. Not a banner day for they WAC or SMU. BTW, the Frog's conference got 4 in.
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2003 11:00 pmRe: WAC
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2003 12:54 amIt will be an interesting matchup with Dayton. This could be an upset if Dante and KJ get on a roll.
Re: WAC
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2003 9:22 ambrace yourselves for all 3 WAC teams who were invited to post season play losing their 1st round games. Hawaii gets a road game at UNLV and Nevada gets to visit Lubbock. Dayton looked pretty good to me and unless Tulsa lights it up from 3 pt land, I don't see them winning that game. Any wins by WAC teams in these tourneys will surprise me.
Re: WAC
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2003 9:51 amI have to agree. Unless Tulsa surprises, 0-3 seems very likely.
Re: WAC
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2003 11:06 amI wouldn't hand Tech a win right now. They played their hearts out here in Dallas trying to make the NCAAs. Who really knows what effect their missing the cut will have on that team.
In my opinion, Nevada gave us two much better games than Texas Tech did - and I believe both of those came when SMU had stepped up their play in the second hald of the season (Granted Tech has stepped up their play as well).
Hawaii could also beat the Rebels, allthough
I think less likely.
And there is not many hotter teams than Tulsa right now . . .
We shall see.
In my opinion, Nevada gave us two much better games than Texas Tech did - and I believe both of those came when SMU had stepped up their play in the second hald of the season (Granted Tech has stepped up their play as well).
Hawaii could also beat the Rebels, allthough
I think less likely.
And there is not many hotter teams than Tulsa right now . . .
We shall see.