Page 2 of 5

Re: Basketball school

PostPosted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 4:12 pm
by EastStang
Let's do a run down. Georgetown, DePaul, Marquette, Villanova, Xavier, Butler, Gonzaga. All either have no football team or FCS teams, yet are on the map because of basketball. Add in UVA, Duke, UNC, Kansas, Wake Forest, Kentucky and Maryland (none of whom are world beaters in football historically) are on the map because of hoops. Now which of these schools are more like SMU? All of them except perhaps Kentucky, Maryland and Kansas. And perhaps by building hoops, we can be enough of a brand name that like WVA and Louisville, we can get ourselves into a P5 conference despite mediocre football (add in perhaps Maryland), and build up that program.

Re: Basketball school

PostPosted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 4:20 pm
by smusportspage
Exactly.

Re: Basketball school

PostPosted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 10:15 pm
by Pony Boss
Good thought east. Just dont want our fans to forget about football and leave it in the second plane.

Re: Basketball school

PostPosted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 10:16 pm
by Pony Boss
Excel in hoops im all for it but also excel in football. We must.

Re: Basketball school

PostPosted: Wed Aug 10, 2016 10:46 am
by redpony
I expect that any P5 conference expansion not including SMU will be a defining moment with regards to our football future. One has to wonder how long our big money supporters of fball will continue their support when we no longer have the chance to be a 'real' player in a major conference.
As has been pointed out, perhaps fcs fball and major support/success in bball is our future role.

Re: Basketball school

PostPosted: Wed Aug 10, 2016 12:09 pm
by PonyTime
AK Pye wanted us to be Duke - and actually, I am fine with that now.

Re: Basketball school

PostPosted: Wed Aug 10, 2016 12:47 pm
by smupony94
Love the people that don't give money or go to games complaining

Re: Basketball school

PostPosted: Wed Aug 10, 2016 5:34 pm
by Pony Boss
redpony wrote:I expect that any P5 conference expansion not including SMU will be a defining moment with regards to our football future. One has to wonder how long our big money supporters of fball will continue their support when we no longer have the chance to be a 'real' player in a major conference.
As has been pointed out, perhaps fcs fball and major support/success in bball is our future role.

Ha if we are left out we are done. Fcs football means money goes bye bye.

Re: Basketball school

PostPosted: Wed Aug 10, 2016 7:20 pm
by East Coast Mustang
Donate to MC, buy football and bball season tickets, do what you can to support the program.

Like Chad said at the signing day event, if you don't contribute, "Don't b1tch"

Re: Basketball school

PostPosted: Sat Aug 13, 2016 4:10 pm
by deucetz
We should definitely put more of an emphasis on basketball.

64 teams make March Madness. 4 teams make Football playoffs.

More parity in basketball.

We shouldn't neglect football, but basketball is the key to relevancy for SMU. We have an easier time being noticed for basketball than football.

Re: Basketball school

PostPosted: Sat Aug 13, 2016 9:11 pm
by Pony Boss
Both are important.

Re: Basketball school

PostPosted: Sun Aug 14, 2016 9:46 am
by SMUstangs22
Soccer school

Re: Basketball school

PostPosted: Sun Aug 14, 2016 5:45 pm
by Pony Boss
SMUstangs22 wrote:Soccer school

Volleyball school. Team is awesome.

Re: Basketball school

PostPosted: Sun Aug 14, 2016 9:30 pm
by sadderbudweiser
Harvard of the south.

Re: Basketball school

PostPosted: Mon Aug 15, 2016 2:01 am
by orguy
sadderbudweiser wrote:Harvard of the south.


SMU is a great school. It is not a Vandy, Rice, Emory, Duke by any stretch of the imagination. All of whom have legitimate claims on the phrase "Harvard of the South".

Eaststang makes a good point but I think SMU should focus on Ping Pong.