Page 1 of 1

uc stat

PostPosted: Mon Mar 13, 2017 12:08 pm
by Terry Webster
Rewatching the game and the espn folks made mention that uc trailed only for 17 seconds in their first two tourney games...closest they were against us was being tied at 0 and 2. Never led.

Re: uc stat

PostPosted: Mon Mar 13, 2017 12:58 pm
by Rebel10
I think Cronin may have just about summed it up.

https://mobile.twitter.com/FOX19Jeremy/ ... 39/video/1

Re: uc stat

PostPosted: Mon Mar 13, 2017 8:50 pm
by Charleston Pony
Rebel10 wrote:I think Cronin may have just about summed it up.

https://mobile.twitter.com/FOX19Jeremy/ ... 39/video/1


True in the case of the package they put together in Tulsa

Re: uc stat

PostPosted: Mon Mar 13, 2017 8:55 pm
by SMUstangs22
We make fun of Cronin a lot but I like a lot of what he says. We are lucky to be developing a rivalry with them.

You still cannot convince me he didnt already know they were toast on Sunday

Re: uc stat

PostPosted: Mon Mar 13, 2017 9:27 pm
by Terry Webster
Cronin has said he is going to speak to the AAC commissioner about the tourney and the Sunday game being pretty much meaningless. Would love to hear that conversation.

Re: uc stat

PostPosted: Mon Mar 13, 2017 10:35 pm
by Puckhead48E
He's almost the anti-Boeheim.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Re: uc stat

PostPosted: Tue Mar 14, 2017 5:56 am
by Charleston Pony
Sunday's game was meaningless in terms of NCAA Tourney invite and possibly seeding, but Cincy did kind of get screwed having to go west. Would like to see the committee keep things regional as best they possibly can. Feel like that initial slot for Cincy was punishment for losing to us in a game that we basically controlled from start to finish