Valuable NCAA Resource

by **Harry0569** » Tue Mar 14, 2017 1:57 pm

This google doc is phenomenal. Check out pg 49 for SMU breakdown.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B2inoL ... 5ZSEk/view

by **SMU Section F** » Tue Mar 14, 2017 2:56 pm

Yeah. I saw that yesterday. Saved it to my Google Drive so I can sound smarter than I really am.

by **JoeKidd** » Tue Mar 14, 2017 2:56 pm

USC is only 5-8 against top 100 teams and one of those wins was against us early.

by **ponyte** » Tue Mar 14, 2017 3:13 pm

Based on those stats, I have UC Davis winning it all now.

by **DiamondM** » Tue Mar 14, 2017 3:21 pm

Typo on the S-Curve analytics vs seeding. It should have said we were among the most underseeded based on this, but it transposed a 21 (actual rank) to 12 (which was our predicted ranking), resulting in a ZERO differential, which is not the case. Our actual underseeding was -9.

by **Grant Carter** » Tue Mar 14, 2017 3:34 pm

DiamondM wrote:Typo on the S-Curve analytics vs seeding. It should have said we were among the most underseeded based on this, but it transposed a 21 (actual rank) to 12 (which was our predicted ranking), resulting in a ZERO differential, which is not the case. Our actual underseeding was -9.

Shown correctly in the underseeding box to the right though.

Valuable NCAA Resource

Valuable NCAA Resource

Re: Valuable NCAA Resource

Re: Valuable NCAA Resource

Re: Valuable NCAA Resource

Re: Valuable NCAA Resource

Re: Valuable NCAA Resource

Who is online