Page 1 of 1

Shake projected #23 in next year's draft

PostPosted: Fri Jun 23, 2017 9:51 pm
by LA_Mustang

Re: Shake projected #23 in next year's draft

PostPosted: Fri Jun 23, 2017 10:21 pm
by PonyLawExpress
Sounds about right. He should have a big year and is already on the NBA radar. His size, shooting ability, and length will help him in the draft.

Re: Shake projected #23 in next year's draft

PostPosted: Sat Jun 24, 2017 10:05 am
by LA_Mustang
I agree. Also, next year's draft shouldn't be near as deep as this year's.

Re: Shake projected #23 in next year's draft

PostPosted: Sat Jun 24, 2017 3:56 pm
by ponyboy
Which means late second round

Re: Shake projected #23 in next year's draft

PostPosted: Sat Jun 24, 2017 5:16 pm
by PonyLawExpress
ponyboy wrote:Which means late second round


:lol: :lol: Shake is a better NBA prospect than Semi and next years draft shouldn't be near as deep. But still, sounds about right.

Re: Shake projected #23 in next year's draft

PostPosted: Tue Jul 04, 2017 11:28 pm
by MFFL02
Shake didn't take that next step his 2nd year like many expected. With Semi gone, Shake will need to be more consistent on offense and carry the team. If that happens, he definitely can be a 1st rounder.

Re: Shake projected #23 in next year's draft

PostPosted: Wed Jul 05, 2017 9:53 am
by hoopmanx
Didn't take that step? You're effin kidding, right?

- moved to PG seamlessly
- ended up best PG in league
- Assist to t/o ratio was good.
- PG on league regular season and tourney champs
- Led team to most wins in school history.

Becoming a PG in scouts eyes destroys everything. Look at the draft this year, 5 or 6 of top 11 were PGs

Re: Shake projected #23 in next year's draft

PostPosted: Thu Jul 06, 2017 9:58 am
by smitty329
Leading SMU to a NCAA championship would do wonders for his draft status.

Re: Shake projected #23 in next year's draft

PostPosted: Thu Jul 06, 2017 11:17 am
by One Trick Pony
smitty329 wrote:Leading SMU to a NCAA championship would do wonders for his draft status.

That all begins at Atlantis in Nassau☆
Booze-Aid is the new Kool-Aid mofos
Image

Re: Shake projected #23 in next year's draft

PostPosted: Thu Jul 06, 2017 12:32 pm
by Black Horseshoe

Re: Shake projected #23 in next year's draft

PostPosted: Thu Jul 06, 2017 2:13 pm
by sadderbudweiser
One Trick Pony wrote:
smitty329 wrote:Leading SMU to a NCAA championship would do wonders for his draft status.

That all begins at Atlantis in Nassau☆
Booze-Aid is the new Kool-Aid mofos
Image



Cwazy wabbit.

Re: Shake projected #23 in next year's draft

PostPosted: Thu Jul 06, 2017 5:55 pm
by MFFL02
hoopmanx wrote:Didn't take that step? You're effin kidding, right?

- moved to PG seamlessly
- ended up best PG in league
- Assist to t/o ratio was good.
- PG on league regular season and tourney champs
- Led team to most wins in school history.

Becoming a PG in scouts eyes destroys everything. Look at the draft this year, 5 or 6 of top 11 were PGs


No, I'm not effing kidding. He was incredibly inconsistent and was passive in many instances. Please don't say led team to most wins in school history...he wasn't the leader of the team last year. And without the gift that is Semi, we wouldn't have won the conference, regular season or tourney.

Re: Shake projected #23 in next year's draft

PostPosted: Sat Jul 08, 2017 3:28 pm
by PonyLawExpress
MFFL02 wrote:
hoopmanx wrote:Didn't take that step? You're effin kidding, right?

- moved to PG seamlessly
- ended up best PG in league
- Assist to t/o ratio was good.
- PG on league regular season and tourney champs
- Led team to most wins in school history.

Becoming a PG in scouts eyes destroys everything. Look at the draft this year, 5 or 6 of top 11 were PGs


No, I'm not effing kidding. He was incredibly inconsistent and was passive in many instances. Please don't say led team to most wins in school history...he wasn't the leader of the team last year. And without the gift that is Semi, we wouldn't have won the conference, regular season or tourney.


I think I can agree with both of your arguments. Shake made the move to PG very well, had a real good assist/TO ratio, shot well, and was pretty clutch when we needed a big shot. I can also agree that Shake was inconsistent at times (based on how good Shake is).

He took a step forward last year no doubt, but wasn't to college superstar status, where I think he can/should get to next year. It is going to be his and Jarrey's team next year. Shake has been putting in the work this offseason.