Re: HART: Who REPLACES Jank? What about Steve Alford?
Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2019 1:18 am
SoCal_Pony wrote:JasonB wrote:Chargios should be viewed as a DITR. In college, anyone who isn't a 4 star or a 3 star with multiple high tier offers is a DITR. Chargois may have been a solid 3 star. but he doesn't fit the upper level recruit category. That is why he falls in that DITR bucket.
IMO, any player from the state of Oklahoma with both OU and OK St offers is not a DITR.
Now a 5’7” PG from the same state without either an OU or Ok St offer, now THAT is your DITR player.
Are you sure that Chargois had offers from OU and OK State? I don't think that was the case. I think there were some suggestions those offers were coming, but I don't think they ever did. His offer list was pretty small... if you think he is at the same level as a recruit as a Ben Moore, then that is even more incriminating against the coaching. rather than the recruiting class.
LA, losing some scholarships didn't hamper the ability to land players, but the OTHER limitations on the program certainly did. It doesn't completely excuse the misses on Froling and Douglas, but there are some impacts there.
All of this said, if we add a stud guard to the current recruiting class, then it is in really good shape. Otherwise, the recruiting class is going to be really sub-par. It really is an either-or condition.