Page 1 of 1

SMU-USF: What can be done in 6.2 seconds?

PostPosted: Fri Feb 08, 2019 9:38 am
by PonyTime
Why were we shooting a 3 when we only needed a two? Taking the ball into the paint can result in either a win or at least a foul and chance to tie. The fact that Jank actually chose to set up that awful play to end the game is insane. While I am pretty sure that the ball was supposed to get to McMurray and ended up in Chag's hands - there is no reason that we should have been jacking up a three pointer in the first place...

What can be done in 6.2 seconds? Actually - quite a lot...

6.1 Seconds on the clock - off a missed FT:



5.5 Seconds:



4.8 Seconds:



4.4 seconds


Re: SMU-USF: What can be done in 6.2 seconds?

PostPosted: Fri Feb 08, 2019 9:51 am
by Pony ^
If something isn't done as soon as we lose the first game in the AAC tournament, that would be the most SMU thing ever. Time to move on. We don't have time to waste

Re: SMU-USF: What can be done in 6.2 seconds?

PostPosted: Fri Feb 08, 2019 10:07 am
by redpony
we can only hope that Miller has pushed our AD(?) into starting a basic search- 'just in case'.
A change must be made and the quicker the better.

Re: SMU-USF: What can be done in 6.2 seconds?

PostPosted: Fri Feb 08, 2019 1:22 pm
by Bergermeister
Pony ^ wrote:If something isn't done as soon as we lose the first game in the AAC tournament, that would be the most SMU thing ever.

^

Re: SMU-USF: What can be done in 6.2 seconds?

PostPosted: Fri Feb 08, 2019 4:44 pm
by Charleston Pony
Listen to Jank's presser. He acknowledges a lot can be done in 6 seconds and the plan was to drive hard and dish only if/when stopped...when USF did stop Whitt's drive, our spacing was terrible and he basically dumped it off into a cluster. I would have to watch that finish again, but assume Chargois was following Whitt for a possible put back. As I watched live, my reaction was that Whitt quit on that play because he didn't want to take the last shot, but might have also been poor spacing and running of the court by the rest of our guys?

Re: SMU-USF: What can be done in 6.2 seconds?

PostPosted: Fri Feb 08, 2019 7:09 pm
by DanFreibergerForHeisman
Charleston Pony wrote:Listen to Jank's presser. He acknowledges a lot can be done in 6 seconds and the plan was to drive hard and dish only if/when stopped...when USF did stop Whitt's drive, our spacing was terrible and he basically dumped it off into a cluster. I would have to watch that finish again, but assume Chargois was following Whitt for a possible put back. As I watched live, my reaction was that Whitt quit on that play because he didn't want to take the last shot, but might have also been poor spacing and running of the court by the rest of our guys?

Looked like we had no clue what we were supposed to be doing to me.

Re: SMU-USF: What can be done in 6.2 seconds?

PostPosted: Sat Feb 09, 2019 8:57 pm
by SMU Pom Mom
I'm partial to this one :D . 1.7 seconds:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f4gugzAwJfg

PS I've watched this clip 452,848 times.

Re: SMU-USF: What can be done in 6.2 seconds?

PostPosted: Sat Feb 09, 2019 10:51 pm
by Arkpony
That WAS good! Kinda like Nick's shot.