Page 2 of 2

Re: Roster Question

PostPosted: Fri Nov 01, 2019 11:36 am
by Dukie
LA_Mustang wrote:
Dukie wrote:What's the basis for Davis' requested waiver?

The mental toll of having to spend a year on the TCU campus.

That's an excellent basis. I'd also forgotten about the weirdness of Dixon's flirtation with UCLA. Hope he gets the waiver.

Re: Roster Question

PostPosted: Fri Nov 01, 2019 1:15 pm
by sadderbudweiser
This is ridiculous. Does the NCAA hire postal workers to review these waivers?
Yeesh!

Re: Roster Question

PostPosted: Mon Nov 04, 2019 4:35 pm
by max the wonder dog
Speaking of roster questions, why is Douglas, who shot 15 % from the field last year, still on the team? Better to hold that scholarship in the off chance of using it for a mid-season transfer.

Re: Roster Question

PostPosted: Mon Nov 04, 2019 10:14 pm
by mavsrage311
mustangxc wrote:So probably McNeill but not Davis.


Think you have it backwards based on what most people are expecting.

Re: Roster Question

PostPosted: Tue Nov 05, 2019 11:25 am
by PonyTime
It's Gameday. Has this been settled yet?

Davis just posted on twitter his excitement for gameday. Does this mean he is playing?

Re: Roster Question

PostPosted: Tue Nov 19, 2019 5:40 pm
by The PonyGrad
We/they are still waiting.
:? :evil:

Re: Roster Question

PostPosted: Tue Nov 19, 2019 5:43 pm
by gostangs
I think we have heard and are appealing. Be ready to be disappointed.

Re: Roster Question

PostPosted: Tue Nov 19, 2019 8:35 pm
by Pony64
gostangs wrote:I think we have heard and are appealing. Be ready to be disappointed.


Really wish someone would take NCAA to court for all if their obvious injustice. It's just so rediculous they can make these kids just sit around waiting on them to make a decision that should be strait forward. An argument can be made that by not letting kids play they're limiting their potential for future earnings. Either by their likeness which is now legal or by visibility to elevate ones potential draft spot.
There is no more biased and corrupt and organization and they must be stood up to.

Re: Roster Question

PostPosted: Tue Nov 19, 2019 10:19 pm
by SMU_Alum11
Pony64 wrote:
gostangs wrote:I think we have heard and are appealing. Be ready to be disappointed.


Really wish someone would take NCAA to court for all if their obvious injustice. It's just so rediculous they can make these kids just sit around waiting on them to make a decision that should be strait forward. An argument can be made that by not letting kids play they're limiting their potential for future earnings. Either by their likeness which is now legal or by visibility to elevate ones potential draft spot.
There is no more biased and corrupt and organization and they must be stood up to.


Cant the student athletes sue for damages of losing playing time and building their future value in the pros? Surely, our fine lawyers on campus can figure out something.