PonyFans.comBoard IndexAround the HilltopFootballRecruitingBasketballOther Sports

US News Rankings

General discussion: anything you want to talk about!

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

Re: US News Rankings

Postby PonyTime » Tue Sep 10, 2019 1:10 pm

^^^Spot on - that's how I see it as well.

And sic nic placing a dagger into the UConn team is always a nice watch. Especially with the White Stripes soundtrack.

For a short while there, I was thinking that perhaps SMU could be the next Duke and a regular moving forward in the basketball scene (Duke wasn't all that special pre Coach K).
"Moral Victories Make Me Sick" - TR

Image
User avatar
PonyTime
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 3384
Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2002 4:01 am
Location: The Green Elephant

Re: US News Rankings

Postby tristatecoog » Tue Sep 10, 2019 5:17 pm

The last provost left to become USF president. A prior Dedman Dean (2010-14) is the Hendrix College president.

I like Tulane's climb back up the rankings. Their president seemed to have a solid background. Prior to coming to Tulane in 2014, President Fitts served 14 years as dean of the University of Pennsylvania Law School, where he also served as Bernard G. Segal Professor of Law. As dean of Penn Law, Fitts was recognized for greatly expanding the school’s offerings in interdisciplinary education. He presided over a quadrupling of Penn Law’s endowment, a more than 40 percent increase in the size of the Law School faculty and a doubling of all forms of student financial aid. He oversaw the rebuilding or renovation of the entire law campus. [15 year Penn faculty member before becoming Dean.] However, Tulane athletics are bottom tier.
tristatecoog
Hall of Famer
 
Posts: 2269
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2000 3:01 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: US News Rankings

Postby AfricanMustang » Wed Sep 11, 2019 9:13 am

SoCal_Pony wrote:
friarwolf wrote:64th.........We are never going to move up in the rankings until we get a president who is going to shake things up and fire deans for poor performance. So frustrating. If anyone saw the WSJ rankings last week, they had us the second most expensive university to attend in the top 80 schools. Can you say disconnect??????


I use to blame RGT more than I do today, now I'm having a hard time understating our BOT and their decision-making capabilities. Current US presidents serve some 6.5 years, RGT will end up serving as SMU's president closer to 30 years. So to say the least, I have zero confidence in our BOT making the right hire to replace him.

As I stated on another post....

30 years ago:

SMU had a somewhat higher national ranking.

SMU had a somewhat higher endowment ranking.

Over the past 30 years our athletics have be abysmal. Absent a short LB run that was mostly destroyed due to our own ineptitude, SMU's record in FB/BB games that matter is 2-110-1. That is 0-56-1 against B12 South in FB and 2-54 against ranked opponents in BB. Crazy.

A school in Waco had a higher ranked Law school and 7 schools in Texas have higher ranked Engineering schools. We are not even ranked in the Top 100 in Engineering, Texas Tech is.

Dallas was ranked #10 in terms of GDP, today we are #4, easily the largest increase of any major US city.

Dallas area in now ranked #3 in terms of Fortune 500 areas, behind only NYC and Chicago.


To pass judgment on the Turner years, one would have to compare were we were 24 years ago in September 1995 when he took over and where we are now. Comparing to 33 years ago before the death penalty isn't fair because the institution, its reputation, its donors (and therefore endowment) dwindled. Turner has been rebuilding, especially the facilities, and the endowment. The facilities and endowment will give us the financial muscle to now focus on scholarships which I understand will be the main focus of the next capital campaign.

It's a chicken and egg issue. To do well in athletics, you need facilities to attract the recruits, but you also need to be winning to get the recruits, but you can not win without the recruits, and you can not get the recruits without the facilities.

Outstanding scholars of national repute want to teach at a university that has research facilities and highly motivated students; to have highly motivated students, you have to have scholarships, outstanding scholars of national repute and the facilities. So you build the endowment to attract the students, and fellowships and endowed faculty positions to attract scholars, and then the research facilities (Ford Research Building, the Engineering facilities, etc.)
“Everything that irritates us about others can lead us to an understanding of ourselves.”
― C.G. Jung
AfricanMustang
Junior Varsity
 
Posts: 117
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2016 8:35 pm
Location: Washington DC

Re: US News Rankings

Postby SoCal_Pony » Wed Sep 11, 2019 2:11 pm

AfricanMustang wrote:
To pass judgment on the Turner years, one would have to compare were we were 24 years ago in September 1995 when he took over and where we are now. Comparing to 33 years ago before the death penalty isn't fair because the institution, its reputation, its donors (and therefore endowment) dwindled. Turner has been rebuilding, especially the facilities, and the endowment. The facilities and endowment will give us the financial muscle to now focus on scholarships which I understand will be the main focus of the next capital campaign.

It's a chicken and egg issue. To do well in athletics, you need facilities to attract the recruits, but you also need to be winning to get the recruits, but you can not win without the recruits, and you can not get the recruits without the facilities.

Outstanding scholars of national repute want to teach at a university that has research facilities and highly motivated students; to have highly motivated students, you have to have scholarships, outstanding scholars of national repute and the facilities. So you build the endowment to attract the students, and fellowships and endowed faculty positions to attract scholars, and then the research facilities (Ford Research Building, the Engineering facilities, etc.)


AA, I agree in principle with what you are saying, you can't just look solely at numbers, but in the case of RGT, he's been here for nearly 25 years, his body of work now stands on its own and has for well over a decade. He absolutely can be judged and I see him and his enabling BOT as failures.

Let's talk about Endowment. I think one could make the argument that after buzzkill Ken Pye, any charming, likeable face (which RGT certainly was), could easily raise funds based solely on Hope and Change. So I'm not certain KP is a negative in this regard. In 1996, SMU's endowment was ranked #32 at almost $600k. Today, we are ranked #67 with $1.65B. For some perspective, the currently ranked #32 endowment is almost $3B. So my point stands and is valid. If anything I was being diplomatic. A drop from #32 to #67 is material, especially for a region of the US that has grown so rapidly economically.

Now I know people will say, 'but SMU has been on this huge capital improvement campaign', and while this is partially true (this campaign hasn't lasted 25 years) it ignores the fact that other schools (especially those with deep pockets) also engage in substantial capital improvements, certainly during a quarter of a century.

You also talk of sports. There is no defense for our record during RGT's tenure here. NONE. We are located at the epicenter of HS sports with substantially more funds than virtually any of these schools and yet Troy, Ark St, Ohio, West Mich, Nevada Reno, Bowling Green, Middle TN St, Old Dominion, Hawaii, Central Mich, Wyoming, Hawaii, UAB (they closed down), Utah St, Ball St, LA Laffy, Rutgers, FLA Atlantic, Temple, Akron, NTSU, Tulane, LA Monroe and So Ala all have higher winning % in FB than SMU during the time RGT has been here. Once again, we are not talking about 5 or 10 or even 15 years, but nearly 25.

Oh, and we've never won an NCAA tournament BB game and pre-LB, never even went to one.

No, the Ken Pye / Death Penalty excuse train left the station years ago. This is all on the current regime.
User avatar
SoCal_Pony
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 5307
Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Newport Beach, CA

Re: US News Rankings

Postby friarwolf » Thu Sep 12, 2019 10:57 am

One last thing. We are now 5-7 years at a 1300 SAT or better and an ACT over 30 the last couple of years with the ACT now being the standard. We have been attracting ever increasing smart motivated students for the past 10 years and continued to teach at the same tired level. Quality of students is not the problem - not holding the deans and the professors to a higher standard to match the increased quality of student is the issue. More scholarships would be great and I agree we need more capital to fund more scholarships. WE do need to lower the true cost of attending here - especially since we have a disconnect on what we charge versus what we deliver to our customers (students). Turner and his gang are doing the classic misdirect - "we need more buildings and scholarships" while the real problem is the quality of the teaching.

By the way, we are getting ready to re-do Cox and add on to the buildings because as we know, we need more new and updated buildings while our rankings at Cox continue to slide into the dumper...Niemi went on cruise control 10 years ago and the new dude with his incredibly average resume is a joke..................
friarwolf
Heisman
 
Posts: 1910
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 9:31 am

Re: US News Rankings

Postby SMU Biz Prof » Fri Sep 13, 2019 10:26 pm

For the record, Cox just revamped it's entire MBA and BBA curriculum to focus on three pillars derived from alumni and business representatives: leadership, analytics, and experiential learning. Cox is also at the forefront of the university in terms of peer-rated course evaluations rather than knowingly biased student evaluations. In addition, TT faculty are evaluated by student alumni before promotion. Cox has its constraints though. Many prestigious TT faculty won't go to an institution that doesn't have a PhD program, and Cox would get zero financial support to fund a PhD program. Also, since the 1980's, TCU has renovated and added onto their business school twice. If you've been to Cox lately, you'd agree the facilities are extremely dated. There aren't even enough classrooms to hold classes during the day, which is why many MBA electives are at night (even for day-time programs). Even with those constraints, this year is the largest class of Cox graduate students; at a time where many high-quality institutions (i.e., Iowa, Wisconson) has shuttered their full-time MBA programs because of dwindling demand. Cox gets the most out of what they are given to work with.
SMU Biz Prof
Newbie
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2018 5:01 pm
Location: Dallas, TX

Previous

Return to Around the Hilltop

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests

 
cron