|
SMU now much mentioned on the webModerators: PonyPride, SmooPower
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
SMU now much mentioned on the webCheck into any of the ESPN or YAHOO or CBS or NBC or school fan forum discussions about the North Carolina situation, and you'll find the SMU death penalty subject continually mentioned. The North Carolina situation is worse than anything the SMU administration did back in the '80's, they say, so NC should get the DP in all major sports. Amazing how often this comparison comes up.
Re: SMU now much mentioned on the webBaseball got it's own death penalty in 1980 and track&field in 2006. We are masters of disaster.
Re: SMU now much mentioned on the web
You have to violate the NCAA rules twice in 5 years to be eligible for the DP. I don't know if that is the case at UNC. If you think SMU wasn't fixing grades back then you are out of your mind. #HammerDown
Re: SMU now much mentioned on the web
The UNC situation isn't just fixing grades, it's having players enrolled in fake classes. Not to mention over a period of 18 years.
Re: SMU now much mentioned on the web
They violated rules continuously for 18 years. Certainly there are two instances within 5 years.
Re: SMU now much mentioned on the webMack Brown will investigate....
Re: SMU now much mentioned on the web
They violated rules continuously for 18 years. Certainly there are two instances within 5 years.[/quote] My understanding is you have to be sanctioned once then caught a second time within 5 years. Otherwise every team that gets in trouble would be eligible for the death penalty because it never boils down to just one infraction
Re: SMU now much mentioned on the webPenn State was considered for a 4 year death penalty but were allowed to buy their way out of it. Weren't sanctioned in the 5 years before.
Re: SMU now much mentioned on the web
My understanding is you have to be sanctioned once then caught a second time within 5 years. Otherwise every team that gets in trouble would be eligible for the death penalty because it never boils down to just one infraction[/quote] They were charged in 2012 for extra benefits to players, lost a bowl game
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 131 guests |
|