by Dutch » Wed Sep 30, 2015 3:31 pm
this is great. Boeheim non-conf would mean his only 'big' missed games would be G-Town & Wisconsin and either Michigan or UCONN in an in-season tourney. if he misses ACC play, he'll be missing Pitt, Miami, Clemson, UNC, BC, WAKE, DUKE, UVA and ND.
can afford to lose one or two of those out of conf games and still win the conference, miss the conf games and lose half or so, no shot at winning ACC (not that it's a guaranty by any means, but a conf like ACC can cannibalize itself so every win counts.
this is going to be VERY interesting as SMU and 'Cuse point fingers at each other's punishments of being VERY equal, but with minor differences.
to say "well Syracuse's penalty is the same because we didn't consider anything prior to the new system in Sept 1, 2013, but then to point at SMU's punishment and say "well, there's a LONG history with both the coach and the school, so that was taken into consideration". can't have it both ways.
could we have a joint suit on our hands with a co-defendant that some would consider a NCAA blue blood in terms of hoops?
Ok this is getting ridiculous...I agree with Dutch on THIS ONE POST by him totally