That really is a hilarious last post. "Not really that subjective" "I included all the rotation players for every season" "Keith Frazier who really did not play his freshman season was not included his freshman season. Harry and Tom who did not impact the season on the court were alson not included"
Seriously. You include rankings for players when it is convienent? If they did not play you don't include them in your rankings? Wow. Frazier played plenty his Freshman season and the reason why Harry and Tom did not play was because they were not very good. The reason that Frazier was not a regular starter was because he was not that good either (unfortunately). Great High School Prospect that did not produce in College.
I appreciate the effort that you are making with your rankings and your posts. Not attacking you. Just don't really see much value in comparing rankings between SMU classes if you do not include all players in all classes. Regardless of any High School Recruit rankings we really do not know how good a player will be in college until they play in college. Rankings are not the gospel. Rankings are a starting point for a conversation, but rankings do not tell you how a player performs in college. Pony up!