Charleston Pony wrote:ponyte wrote:One wonders how bad things would have been with Jank?
Might have had K.D. and Bandoumel back so it would have come down to replacing the Weathers brothers which would have been a tall order. The 2 incoming frosh he had recruited would probably not have helped much but he might have been able to finish close to .500
It was the right decision to move on from the Jank era as NIT appeared to be his ceiling
KD said he would have stayed and Bandoumel was close with Jank, too — my guess is he would have stayed, too.
Moving on from any coach or GM or player is only a good idea if the replacement is an improvement. It’s too early to say Lanier can’t coach, but the comparison after one year isn’t even close. We lost out best player specifically because Jank wasn’t back, and we stumbled to 10 wins. TEN.
We ran off a coach who (made excuses and) navigated the probation and lost scholarships he inherited, and he won 24 games last year, which doesn’t exactly scream "job stability" to the next coach. When any coach is hired the school always brags about how many amazing candidates wanted the job, but there’s no way this brought out a deep pool of candidates.
Hopefully Lanier proves to be a great hire. We'll see.