Jarvis Woodson #11 (Ennis) thru week 5
32 Receptions for 524 yards 12 touchdowns on receptions plus another 5 punt returns for TD's. He is now averaging 20 yards on punt returns. The reasons that the DMN gave for not placing Jarvis in the top 100 are lame....size is the reason (5'8 170). Case in ...

Jarvis Woodson #11 (Ennis) thru week 5
32 Receptions for 524 yards 12 touchdowns on receptions plus another 5 punt returns for TD's. He is now averaging 20 yards on punt returns. The reasons that the DMN gave for not placing Jarvis in the top 100 are lame....size is the reason (5'8 170). Case in ...

Ok think what you want but it is funny that AJ is good enough for TT but not for SMU. Jarvis and Cox will end up going somewhere and contibuting big time, too bad Bennett thinks that they have enough. Sure would be nice if the SMU QB had someone to throw it to (if he had time as you say)

Yes it was AJ that was there, and he is better than any receiver that SMU currently has. The other Ennis player is a DB and last years starting running back. The 3rd the one that couldn't be there is Jarvis Woodson #11. You think that just because the all mighty Mustangs aren't looking at either one ...

OldPony said: "The coaches need support to continue to upgrade the talent level and to try to build some excitement around the past 2 recruiting classes". I know for a fact that there were two Ennis players at your game that could start for you today. One is sought after by Texas Tech. Yes, they ...