|
UNT looked faster and more athletic than SMUModerators: PonyPride, SmooPower
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
UNT looked faster and more athletic than SMUThat was tough to admit considering it was UNT.
#HammerDown
Re: UNT looked faster and more athletic than SMUEveryone sadly would look more athletic and faster then us right now.
Re: UNT looked faster and more athletic than SMUAlso see McCarneys post-game remarks. No fluff b.s., just talking about how they brought their game to us and played their kind of football
Re: UNT looked faster and more athletic than SMUAnd I don't think UNT is going to be that good of a team this year.
"We will play man to man and we will pick you up at the airport." - Larry Brown
________________________Champion________________________ ![]()
Re: UNT looked faster and more athletic than SMU
Won't keep them from winning games though because their schedule sucks. They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security
-Benjamin Franklin
Re: UNT looked faster and more athletic than SMU
Ours isn't that good after TCU imo. #HammerDown
Re: UNT looked faster and more athletic than SMUCertainly a much more physical team than SMU. Announcers kept talking about how physical they are and how physical they practice. Except for the rare occasion, our team looked soft and like they weren't used to being physical.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Peruna is my mascot!
Re: UNT looked faster and more athletic than SMU
Yeah but we're worse than every one of those teams, several of them will blow us out (ECU, Cincy, Coog High, UCF). If you don't think that's possible let me remind you that many thought there was no way in Hell that NTSU would beat us let alone blow us out. They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security
-Benjamin Franklin
Re: UNT looked faster and more athletic than SMU
#unttopsmubottom Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Peruna is my mascot!
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 17 guests |
|