PonyFans.comBoard IndexAround the HilltopFootballRecruitingBasketballOther Sports

UNT looked faster and more athletic than SMU

This is the forum for talk about SMU Football

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

UNT looked faster and more athletic than SMU

Postby Rebel10 » Sun Sep 07, 2014 8:41 am

That was tough to admit considering it was UNT.
#HammerDown
Rebel10
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 12534
Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:20 pm

Re: UNT looked faster and more athletic than SMU

Postby jimhagle » Sun Sep 07, 2014 8:47 am

Everyone sadly would look more athletic and faster then us right now.
jimhagle
Heisman
 
Posts: 1478
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 12:14 pm
Location: dallas

Re: UNT looked faster and more athletic than SMU

Postby RGV Pony » Sun Sep 07, 2014 8:55 am

Also see McCarneys post-game remarks. No fluff b.s., just talking about how they brought their game to us and played their kind of football
User avatar
RGV Pony
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 17269
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Dallas

Re: UNT looked faster and more athletic than SMU

Postby SMU 86 » Sun Sep 07, 2014 8:57 am

And I don't think UNT is going to be that good of a team this year.
"We will play man to man and we will pick you up at the airport." - Larry Brown

________________________Champion________________________
Image
User avatar
SMU 86
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 12943
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 6:41 pm

Re: UNT looked faster and more athletic than SMU

Postby sbsmith » Sun Sep 07, 2014 9:09 am

SMU 86 wrote:And I don't think UNT is going to be that good of a team this year.



Won't keep them from winning games though because their schedule sucks.
They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security

-Benjamin Franklin
sbsmith
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 9540
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 11:21 am
Location: Dallas

Re: UNT looked faster and more athletic than SMU

Postby Rebel10 » Sun Sep 07, 2014 9:15 am

sbsmith wrote:
SMU 86 wrote:And I don't think UNT is going to be that good of a team this year.



Won't keep them from winning games though because their schedule sucks.

Ours isn't that good after TCU imo.
#HammerDown
Rebel10
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 12534
Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:20 pm

Re: UNT looked faster and more athletic than SMU

Postby PonySnob » Sun Sep 07, 2014 9:22 am

Certainly a much more physical team than SMU. Announcers kept talking about how physical they are and how physical they practice. Except for the rare occasion, our team looked soft and like they weren't used to being physical.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Peruna is my mascot!
User avatar
PonySnob
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 11516
Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: UNT looked faster and more athletic than SMU

Postby sbsmith » Sun Sep 07, 2014 9:24 am

Rebel10 wrote:Ours isn't that good after TCU imo.



Yeah but we're worse than every one of those teams, several of them will blow us out (ECU, Cincy, Coog High, UCF). If you don't think that's possible let me remind you that many thought there was no way in Hell that NTSU would beat us let alone blow us out.
They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security

-Benjamin Franklin
sbsmith
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 9540
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 11:21 am
Location: Dallas

Re: UNT looked faster and more athletic than SMU

Postby PonySnob » Sun Sep 07, 2014 9:30 am

sbsmith wrote:
Rebel10 wrote:Ours isn't that good after TCU imo.



Yeah but we're worse than every one of those teams, several of them will blow us out (ECU, Cincy, Coog High, UCF). If you don't think that's possible let me remind you that many thought there was no way in Hell that NTSU would beat us let alone blow us out.


#unttopsmubottom


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Peruna is my mascot!
User avatar
PonySnob
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 11516
Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Dallas, TX


Return to Football

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 17 guests