PonyFans.comBoard IndexAround the HilltopFootballRecruitingBasketballOther Sports

37 point blowout loss to UNT

This is the forum for talk about SMU Football

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

37 point blowout loss to UNT

Postby Rebel10 » Sat Sep 06, 2014 9:46 pm

SMH.
#HammerDown
Rebel10
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 12534
Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:20 pm

Re: 37 point blowout loss to UNT

Postby North Texan » Mon Sep 08, 2014 3:16 am

Y'all better get used to this because that's going to be the situation for the next 10 years...
North Texan
Newbie
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2014 11:36 pm

Re: 37 point blowout loss to UNT

Postby floridianstang » Mon Sep 08, 2014 7:27 am

North Texan wrote:Y'all better get used to this because that's going to be the situation for the next 10 years...


Can we ban these north texas state clowns? This is an outlier and we will go back to what we have always done, beating NTSU on and off field/court.
floridianstang
All-American
 
Posts: 710
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2014 4:51 am

Re: 37 point blowout loss to UNT

Postby RGV Pony » Mon Sep 08, 2014 7:29 am

No we need to take our medicine and never forget what complacency gets us
User avatar
RGV Pony
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 17269
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Dallas

Re: 37 point blowout loss to UNT

Postby sbsmith » Mon Sep 08, 2014 7:43 am

Fire June
They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security

-Benjamin Franklin
sbsmith
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 9540
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 11:21 am
Location: Dallas

Re: 37 point blowout loss to UNT

Postby mrydel » Mon Sep 08, 2014 7:49 am

RGV Pony wrote:No we need to take our medicine and never forget what complacency gets us

Agree. If anyone here starts posting in a manner described as unacceptable by the mods then banning is fine. The fact that they believe they are better than us and just beat our butts in an embarrassing fashion should allow them certain crowing rights. There is a way to silence that but it will take a change in direction for the football team.
All those who believe in psycho kinesis, raise my hand
User avatar
mrydel
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 32035
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Sherwood,AR,USA

Re: 37 point blowout loss to UNT

Postby CalallenStang » Mon Sep 08, 2014 7:52 am

mrydel wrote:
RGV Pony wrote:No we need to take our medicine and never forget what complacency gets us

Agree. If anyone here starts posting in a manner described as unacceptable by the mods then banning is fine. The fact that they believe they are better than us and just beat our butts in an embarrassing fashion should allow them certain crowing rights. There is a way to silence that but it will take a change in direction for the football team.


Agree as well. Let them crow. They will make their own bed.
User avatar
CalallenStang
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 19359
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 9:43 pm
Location: 25 feet from the Hillcrest track

Re: 37 point blowout loss to UNT

Postby No Quarter » Mon Sep 08, 2014 8:42 am

mrydel wrote:
RGV Pony wrote:No we need to take our medicine and never forget what complacency gets us

Agree. If anyone here starts posting in a manner described as unacceptable by the mods then banning is fine. The fact that they believe they are better than us and just beat our butts in an embarrassing fashion should allow them certain crowing rights. There is a way to silence that but it will take a change in direction for the football team.


Unfortunately myrdel has it right. One way or another I've been on this board for a long time and remember when the talk was with TCU fans after the Frogs had started the action which led to their present position. It was obvious the two football programs were on different tracks but some of our posters continued to talk about SMU out recruiting TCU and winning the next game and so on.

That dialogue no longer exists. There is still some SMU smack, yes, but TCU is ahead and some of the TCU posts we see are from people sympathetic to our plight.

Its the same way with UNT now. This is a conversation about sports and football. No bragging about academics or the potential value of a degree or student demographics is relevant, or the BB team. We are in a situation where UNT at least has parity on the football field for the foreseeable future. It does not matter if we we have a W - L margin to use up. We had that with other schools too, and an overall winning percentage, but is has been a while since an SMU football coach won half his games at SMU.

I hope that the SMU football program can be revived but there is little enough I can do personally. I'm 800 miles away and not able see a game often, or contribute. I understand that there might be some conference rearrangements some years hence when TV contracts are renewed. To me it is apparent that big state schools will be at the head of the list for P5 consideration: UCF, USF, SDSU, Houston, even UNT, CSU and Memphis. The big state schools which already have P5 status will support their applications.

I don't know how to address that. I thought SMU had good marketing in the eighties, and some options and possiblities then that no longer exist. If there is a way it starts with winning games.

IMO the talk from UNT may help. Gosh knows if SMU faithful are allowed to say it, we ought to be able to take it from others.
No Quarter
Heisman
 
Posts: 1509
Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2000 4:01 am


Return to Football

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Dukie and 23 guests