leopold wrote:No, it's not.
Title IX isn't necessarily about athletics; it's about all of education - sports just so happen to be where much of the focus has been, probably because a few decades ago they were the most egregious violators, with the overwhelming majority of money and emphasis put on men's sports. But the whole point is about equal access and support in education, not equal results. For example, women have surpassed men in numbers and percentages across the spectrum of enrollment.
Frankly,I'd argue women women would do a little better than most people would believe, even though it would most probably still favor men. I'd say it would end up probably being about 70/30 or so, but, still, it would favor men. But it would be fair by all legal accounts, and the funding issues would clear up.
70/30

...........try 98/2.
There isn't a single male sport where a female could compete (except possibly rifle?). Of the 20 female team sports, the only one's that wouldn't be totally dominated by men might be Badminton, Synchronized swimming, and bowling. Which, outside of women's athletics, I'm not sure are even considered sports.
Are we being punked here?