|
TCU FOOTBALL SCHEDULEModerators: PonyPride, SmooPower
24 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
I agree if this is a defensive struggle then a mistake is going to decide the game. If that is the case, I could see Mac trying something and having it blow up in his face leading to a TCU score. As I said, I think Patterson will approach this one a lot like Bennett approached the North Texas game, playing conservative and not to lose. As we know that can be a regrettable strategy. If either team gets a ten point lead that team wins.
I think TCU@Texas will be a fun game. It wouldn't break my heart to see TCU win. I remember listening to the game in LA when SMU (with McIlhenny starting) beat Texas, 20-6?? in 1982?? and I couldn't believe we pulled it off. (Wonder what the spread was?). College is an emotional game and no one is unbeatable. Most teams have really "bad" games once or twice a season. i.e. TCU vs. SMU two years ago and SMU vs. N. Texas last year.
The game will be good; Andy Dalton will most-likely be our quarterback [if all goes right]. Based on what I've seen in him, both in high school and at practice, he's a lot more diverse and articulate than Jeff Ballard.
Time will indeed tell, my Ponies.
The point spread was 20. And no, we were not favored. Texas was #2 at the time and we had a freshman QB starting his first game and were coming off a two game losing streak. The win brought me a $K and more joy than you can imagine. The best part was walking out of Memorial Stadium celebrating the win and having a burnt orange clad fan somewhere between 65 and death flip me off and yell "F-you, SMU." Really great fans down there.
We're proud of our English department??? Seriously, I'm concerned about QB - it sure would be nice to have Bomar ready to roll in Austin. I think our D keeps us in the game and it's going to come down to the QB making a couple big plays (or not making a couple bad plays). It's a tall task for an unproven QB to win at a place like UT but we've had good luck with unproven QBs stepping up over the last 5 years (Hassel and Ballard). I'm just glad we have the chance to play 'em.
I wouldn't be "concerned," but would be "questioning."
24 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 5 guests |
|