by Stallion » Fri Jun 08, 2007 10:42 am
Here's part of an article on the rule change and how it has detrimentally affected these All-Star Games
SUMMER SCHOOL
At issue is the part of the NCAA reform package that allows major colleges — starting this year — to pay tuition for incoming freshman athletes to attend summer school. The idea is noble enough — allow the kids complete a semester of schoolwork before the crush of academics and athletics hits in the fall. But a look back at how the rule was slipped in with the package reveals different motives.
Half a decade ago, the Southeastern Conference proposed NCAA legislation to allow major-college football players to have their tuition paid the summer before their freshman seasons. The NCAA struck it down, in part over concerns that smaller programs would not be able to cover such expenses and in part because of suspicions about the rationale behind the measure. Some believed the football factories were as focused on getting the young athletes into their workout programs as they were with getting them into the classrooms.
Around the same time, however, Big Ten commissioner Jim Delany convinced the NCAA to allow Division I college basketball teams to conduct a five-year “pilot†program in which schools could pay for freshman summer school. Summer school immediately became an unofficial requirement for all newcomers. The coaches wanted to get them on campus to get started on the academic load and to begin assimilation into the basketball program. No athlete had to arrive in the summer. But if he wanted to keep pace with the rest of the program, a freshman had little choice but to show up.
After much debate over who else should be allowed to receive summer tuition once the pilot program expired — basketball players, football players, academically “at-risk†athletes only — the NCAA included all Division I athletes. So the rule was written into the overall reform package that was passed last year.