DH, like the Dallas Morning News has only a marginal connection to "news." The job of the DMN is to sell newspapers, not the noble pursuit of truth, justice and the right story. Just to sell fish-rap. Once that concept is accepted, it is easier to understand articles that appear to be biased, partly or completely false, or blatantly offensive. It sells...it works.
DH is in the business to gain market share because it sells...it works for his employer. You may dislike him, pity him for poor work ethic and an alleged addiction, and for past swipes at SMU, but I contend that you should know what you are getting when you enter into a conversation or professional relationship with him or virtually any other media type. It simplifies the equation, and you rarely surprised by the dialogue or veracity of the outcome. It sells, it works...
The JJ interview raised SMU's visibility...that was the devil's handshake of doing the interview. A question was asked by DH that could have been motivated from any number of perspectives, but ultimately gained attention ( ie viewership, market share, advertiser revenue ). Even DH haters here watched or became aware because we had a dog in the fight via JJ. DH is doing what media does..selling. Accept it, and take advantage of the relationship to work to your own interests.