CFN -thoughts about SMU class

by **indianmustang** » Wed Feb 13, 2008 7:46 am

SMU
The class is heavy on ... Skill players. Surprisingly, considering June Jones is taking over, the Mustangs brought in a ton of running back prospects. Most are small, quick backs, like Quincey Whittington and Bryce Lunday, who'll likely be moved to receiver right away. Three decent wide receivers were brought in, but the two best targets might be the tight ends, Taylor Thompson, Kevin Grenier and Andrew Ellison. Considering Jones doesn't use a tight end, they could end up being big wide receivers or get moved to the defensive side. Bo Mitchell and Braden Smith have to show Jones early on that the star quarterback of the future is on the roster.
The player who'll someday be a really big deal ... QB Bo Mitchell
The player you might care about this year ... TE Taylor Thompson
What it all means to the real world of college football ... Even though Jones had about ten minutes to work, he still did a decent job of keeping the recruits coming in from the Phil Bennett era while starting to make inroads at putting the pieces in place. It's audition time for the quarterbacks and receivers brought in since Jones is almost certain to pluck a star Texas passer or two next year to be the

by **RushStPony** » Wed Feb 13, 2008 9:19 am

I'm not normally a post Nazi, but shouldn't this be in the recruiting forum?

by **JasonB** » Wed Feb 13, 2008 9:23 am

Wow, that could be the worst analysis of the recruiting class EVER. Those guys are all slots, not RBs and the TEs are moved to DE.

by **Buckethead** » Wed Feb 13, 2008 10:15 am

I like the part where he says the two best targets may be the tight ends and then list 3 players.

I can't believe that I am correcting somebody else's typing........

by **MustangLaxer** » Wed Feb 13, 2008 10:20 am

yah dude...you need to get a clue about the recruiting class before posting...and it should be NATIVE AMERICAN mustang :wink:

by **Dutch** » Wed Feb 13, 2008 10:24 am

JasonB wrote:Wow, that could be the worst analysis of the recruiting class EVER. Those guys are all slots, not RBs and the TEs are moved to DE.

in his defense, he does say in the same sentence, that the running back prospects (meaning they were RBs in HS) will be moved immediately to receiver. ALSO says that the TEs will be moved to either receiver or DE.

by **Mustangsabu** » Wed Feb 13, 2008 10:54 am

MustangLaxer wrote:yah dude...you need to get a clue about the recruiting class before posting...and it should be NATIVE AMERICAN mustang

Not if he is from the sub-continent.....

by **indianmustang** » Wed Feb 13, 2008 11:04 am

yes
from india

none of the above description is mine it its just copy paste from CFN

by **smu diamond m** » Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:13 pm

He was making a NCAA joke...

by **Junior** » Wed Feb 13, 2008 4:24 pm

Dutch wrote:
JasonB wrote:Wow, that could be the worst analysis of the recruiting class EVER. Those guys are all slots, not RBs and the TEs are moved to DE.

in his defense, he does say in the same sentence, that the running back prospects (meaning they were RBs in HS) will be moved immediately to receiver. ALSO says that the TEs will be moved to either receiver or DE.

Agreed. Also, the title of the thread indicates that it is from CFN. You didn't really think this was indianmustang's analysis, did you?

by **couch 'em** » Wed Feb 13, 2008 4:33 pm

Telecom, not Teepee.

by **smu diamond m** » Wed Feb 13, 2008 5:06 pm

couch 'em wrote:Telecom, not Teepee.

dot, not feather

No offense!

by **couch 'em** » Wed Feb 13, 2008 5:16 pm

Brahmin, (or Bhagavad Gita) not Buffalo

CFN -thoughts about SMU class

CFN -thoughts about SMU class

Who is online