PonyFans.comBoard IndexAround the HilltopFootballRecruitingBasketballOther Sports

We were much more competitive last year

This is the forum for talk about SMU Football

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

We were much more competitive last year

Postby SMU21TCU10 » Sat Sep 20, 2008 11:49 pm

Last year we were within a touchdown in 6 of our losses was it? And we went to overtime twice. We lost to tcu at tcu 21-7. Our offense is putting up a lot less yards than last year. I feel like we payed 2 mil year for just an offensive coordinator...
User avatar
SMU21TCU10
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 4347
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 8:07 pm
Location: Mos Eisley, Tatooine

Postby Duke Blue Blood » Sat Sep 20, 2008 11:50 pm

True...in that we were more competitive....
User avatar
Duke Blue Blood
Heisman
 
Posts: 1050
Joined: Wed Nov 20, 2002 4:01 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: We were much more competitive last year

Postby Junior » Sun Sep 21, 2008 1:12 pm

SMU21TCU10 wrote:Last year we were within a touchdown in 6 of our losses was it? And we went to overtime twice. We lost to tcu at tcu 21-7. Our offense is putting up a lot less yards than last year. I feel like we payed 2 mil year for just an offensive coordinator...


I feel like we paid 2 mil to bench JW.
Derail the Frogs!
User avatar
Junior
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 11513
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 11:56 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Postby Charleston Pony » Sun Sep 21, 2008 1:15 pm

yes...we were more competitive last year. We were prety creative at times finding new ways to lose. But...when all was said and done, we were 1-11. That's the reality of where SMU football dwells.
Charleston Pony
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 28982
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2000 3:01 am
Location: Stonebridge Golf Club, NC

Postby KnuckleStang » Sun Sep 21, 2008 1:26 pm

How did we do against top 25 teams last year. Oh yeah that's right, we didn't play any. We've played two in a row (TCU, if not top 25 is probably top 30). I am not convinced we were more competitive then. I think we will see closer games as our team improves and our opposition weakens, and possibly we will win a couple. It's not like we play in the SEC.
User avatar
KnuckleStang
Hall of Famer
 
Posts: 2605
Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2002 4:01 am
Location: Lynchburg, VA, USA

Postby Charleston Pony » Sun Sep 21, 2008 2:29 pm

KnuckleStang wrote:How did we do against top 25 teams last year. Oh yeah that's right, we didn't play any. We've played two in a row (TCU, if not top 25 is probably top 30). I am not convinced we were more competitive then. I think we will see closer games as our team improves and our opposition weakens, and possibly we will win a couple. It's not like we play in the SEC.



just don't get your hopes up. Tulane played Alabama and ECU tough. Another road game - likely another bad loss. The rest of the schedule looks pretty tough. Can only hope these guys continue to improve and watch Memphis' season - they might be our only hope for another win since that's a home game and Homecoming (which means hopefully as many as 15k fans that day.
Charleston Pony
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 28982
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2000 3:01 am
Location: Stonebridge Golf Club, NC

Postby PoconoPony » Sun Sep 21, 2008 3:06 pm

KnuckleStang wrote:How did we do against top 25 teams last year. Oh yeah that's right, we didn't play any. We've played two in a row (TCU, if not top 25 is probably top 30). I am not convinced we were more competitive then. I think we will see closer games as our team improves and our opposition weakens, and possibly we will win a couple. It's not like we play in the SEC.


I agree that the schedule, with the exception of Texas State, has thus far been probably far tougher than last year. Problem is to figure out whether or not the teams on the remaining schedule have improved or remained somewhat the same. Because of the QB situation, I would guess the team is not as good as last year for many reasons to include placing the defense in difficult situations and forcing them to be on the field for far too much time thereby affecting/reducing effectiveness.
PoconoPony
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 4436
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:01 pm
Location: Nesquehoning, Pennsylvania

Postby MustangTu » Sun Sep 21, 2008 3:31 pm

Look at the out of conference schedule for the years to come it won't get any better. We were more competitive last year.
MustangTu
Junior Varsity
 
Posts: 137
Joined: Sun Feb 29, 2004 1:49 am

Postby Corp » Sun Sep 21, 2008 5:39 pm

[quote="KnuckleStang"]

We've played two in a row (TCU, if not top 25 is probably top 30).


USAToday Coaches' TOP 25: TCU #23
Corp
Varsity
 
Posts: 402
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2004 6:18 pm

Re: We were much more competitive last year

Postby PlanoStang » Sun Sep 21, 2008 6:09 pm

Junior wrote:
SMU21TCU10 wrote:Last year we were within a touchdown in 6 of our losses was it? And we went to overtime twice. We lost to tcu at tcu 21-7. Our offense is putting up a lot less yards than last year. I feel like we payed 2 mil year for just an offensive coordinator...


I feel like we paid 2 mil to bench JW.


Basically.

And our defense couldn't stop a speeding herd of 3 legged turtles. :roll:

Maybe we could hire back Phil as defensive coordinator, Rusty Burns, as
OC, and let JJ run things. :lol:
User avatar
PlanoStang
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 3258
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2003 3:01 am
Location: Plano, Texas USA

Postby gostangs » Sun Sep 21, 2008 6:34 pm

rusty burns as OC? Please spare me. We have lost exactly one game more then anyone sane might have thought - Rice.

JUCO's are the answer. 2 LB's, 1 DL, and 1 safety.
gostangs
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 12315
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2002 4:01 am
Location: Dallas, Texas USA

Postby Mustangs35SMU » Sun Sep 21, 2008 6:41 pm

gostangs wrote:rusty burns as OC? Please spare me. We have lost exactly one game more then anyone sane might have thought - Rice.


That's being way too sensible.

Just as three games doesn't make a coaching career...neither does 4 games.
Image
User avatar
Mustangs35SMU
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 13007
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2002 3:01 am
Location: Garland, TX

Re: We were much more competitive last year

Postby SoCal_Pony » Sun Sep 21, 2008 8:14 pm

SMU21TCU10 wrote:We were much more competitive last year.


Last year Sagarin ranked us #169.

Western Michigan, Eastern Washington, Western Kentucky, Western Illinois, Eastern Michigan, Eastern Kentucky, Northeastern, Northern Illinois, Northern Arizona, Central Arkansas and Stony Brook were all ranked higher than us.

This year Sagarin has us ranked #142.

We can debate which team is more competitive, SMU of this year or last, but what is the real point?

It’s like having a debate over which turd’s smell is the least offensive. In the end, they are both turds and both offensive.
User avatar
SoCal_Pony
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 5901
Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2003 4:01 am


Return to Football

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 20 guests