Tulsa escapes SMU

by **HB Pony Dad** » Sun Oct 12, 2008 9:42 pm

From Tulsa World

http://www.tulsaworld.com/sports/colleg ... lsas473251

"But there was one call that will probably cause SMU coach June Jones migraines for a few nights.

Tulsa (3-0 in C-USA) was faced with a 31-24 deficit, and a fourth-and-21 from the SMU 33-yard line. Quarterback
David Johnson, who was having an off night, lined up for a quick kick.

Instead of punting, the senior launched a high-arcing pass to Trae Johnson, who outleaped a defensive back and pulled down a touchdown pass to tie the game at 31 with 9:53 left."

Groan :evil:

by **mrydel** » Mon Oct 13, 2008 9:06 am

I was telling Mustangbill67 that they were going to quick kick when I saw the formation. I was very surprised when they did not and then fell back into the reality that we can not stop a 3rd or 4th down with more than 15 yards to go.

by **03Mustang** » Mon Oct 13, 2008 9:18 am

I thought quickkick as well - problem is that with our luck even if they had I bet they would have somehow come away with the 1st down or a TD.

Once that happened, I was pretty sure we were done for...it sucks being right sometimes.

by **Stallion** » Mon Oct 13, 2008 9:24 am

Really? I had no doubt they were going for it-and SMU should have expected it too

by **mrydel** » Mon Oct 13, 2008 9:51 am

Stallion wrote:Really? I had no doubt they were going for it-and SMU should have expected it too

I did not doubt them going for it as they came to the line, but if you looked at the set up when they came to the line it was similar to the way they line up for an extra point. It was not a standard offense play line up. I actually relaxed when I saw it and made my remark to Mustang Bill. Sad to say that our defense might have seen the same thing.

by **sail420s** » Mon Oct 13, 2008 10:26 am

They started in a normal formation, then moved to a pooch punt formation. Our defense stayed in position for a normal play...which is the problem. With 4th and 21 from the 33, why did we not have two safeties standing on the 10? If they throw it, you have two guys deep to stop them. If they kick, you have two guys to field it.

by **mrydel** » Mon Oct 13, 2008 10:31 am

sail420s wrote:They started in a normal formation, then moved to a pooch punt formation. Our defense stayed in position for a normal play...which is the problem. With 4th and 21 from the 33, why did we not have two safeties standing on the 10? If they throw it, you have two guys deep to stop them. If they kick, you have two guys to field it.

Jones mentioned in his interview that it just happened that we had a true freshman on the field for the play. He played tight which is what you do not do in a 4th and 21. Jones just kind of sighed and said the kid learned something.

by **Dark Horse** » Mon Oct 13, 2008 10:41 am

Stallion wrote:Really? I had no doubt they were going for it-and SMU should have expected it too

Of course you didn't. They warped their line into the horseshoe-shaped "protect" look employed on punts, but you saw right through it? You should be coaching, too.

by PK » Mon Oct 13, 2008 11:13 am

sail420s wrote:They started in a normal formation, then moved to a pooch punt formation. Our defense stayed in position for a normal play...which is the problem. With 4th and 21 from the 33, why did we not have two safeties standing on the 10? If they throw it, you have two guys deep to stop them. If they kick, you have two guys to field it.

We actually did have someone on their receiver by the time he got to the endzone, but it wound up being a jump ball and their receiver won the jump.

Tulsa escapes SMU

Tulsa escapes SMU

Who is online