Ponygrad,
I totally agree. We should be at least 2 -2 through the first 4 games. In my earlier post I guess I was thinking strictly nonconference which could be 2 - 2 or possibly 1 - 3. Hope I am wrong but just being realistic.
|
Early C-USA Bowl TalkModerators: PonyPride, SmooPower
18 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Re: Early C-USA Bowl TalkPonygrad,
I totally agree. We should be at least 2 -2 through the first 4 games. In my earlier post I guess I was thinking strictly nonconference which could be 2 - 2 or possibly 1 - 3. Hope I am wrong but just being realistic.
Re: Early C-USA Bowl Talk4 and 0 would be best. 2 and 2 good. 1 and 3 but showing improvement and fight wouldn't be too bad.
Re: Early C-USA Bowl TalkI think both UAB and Wash St are must-wins if bowling is our goal - winning either the Tech or TCU game would be great, but I think we have to acknowledge that those games will both be very tough to win.
2-2 through the first 4 games is realistic...anything less and we're in trouble. Anything more and we can start getting really excited. FWIW, I think we end up 2-2 in non-conf as well...we aren't going to let Navy take the Gansz trophy again.
18 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 7 guests |
|