PonyFans.comBoard IndexAround the HilltopFootballRecruitingBasketballOther Sports

Loved How

This is the forum for talk about SMU Football

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

Loved How

Postby SmooBoy » Sun Oct 10, 2010 1:12 am

The referee sounded like 20's Reporter Guy. "It was holding, seeee!"
User avatar
SmooBoy
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 5820
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Trophy Club

Re: Loved How

Postby soccermom » Sun Oct 10, 2010 8:07 am

Towards the end of the game when we had 2 holding calls against us, he just said No number--referring to our player who was called for the 2nd hold!!
User avatar
soccermom
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 3357
Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2009 9:48 am
Location: League City, Tx

Re: Loved How

Postby b_caesar » Sun Oct 10, 2010 11:43 am

If they're gonna have to name player numbers for infractions, the second one shouldn't have been enforced. Does that mean the entire team got a holding call?

That was the second most befuddling call of the night. (Right behind the phantom "knee down" call.)
Don't worry. Be Happy. Or not.
User avatar
b_caesar
Heisman
 
Posts: 1539
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 10:17 pm
Location: North America

Re: Loved How

Postby mrydel » Sun Oct 10, 2010 11:58 am

b_caesar wrote:If they're gonna have to name player numbers for infractions, the second one shouldn't have been enforced. Does that mean the entire team got a holding call?

That was the second most befuddling call of the night. (Right behind the phantom "knee down" call.)

There was nothing befuddling. There were 2 holding calls. Tulsa took the one that pushed us back the farthest. The official either forgot or did not see the number. It happens in most games that either a number is not called or an incorrect number is called. The number being called and being correct is not a requirement for a penalty.
All those who believe in psycho kinesis, raise my hand
User avatar
mrydel
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 32037
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Sherwood,AR,USA

Re: Loved How

Postby ebrooks11 » Sun Oct 10, 2010 12:01 pm

mrydel wrote:
b_caesar wrote:If they're gonna have to name player numbers for infractions, the second one shouldn't have been enforced. Does that mean the entire team got a holding call?

That was the second most befuddling call of the night. (Right behind the phantom "knee down" call.)

There was nothing befuddling. There were 2 holding calls. Tulsa took the one that pushed us back the farthest. The official either forgot or did not see the number. It happens in most games that either a number is not called or an incorrect number is called. The number being called and being correct is not a requirement for a penalty.



Right on Mrydel the people sitting behind be were calling that the worst call of the night and if they cant name a number then there must not have been a penalty. On that play I dont think there was one ref with a flag left, they were spread all over the field.
ebrooks11
Heisman
 
Posts: 1303
Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2006 9:13 am

Re: Loved How

Postby sail420s » Sun Oct 10, 2010 12:09 pm

b_caesar wrote:Does that mean the entire team got a holding call?


I liked when the announcer said their player was tackled by " the entire defensive line"
sail420s
Varsity
 
Posts: 336
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 11:14 pm
Location: The Colony, TX

Re: Loved How

Postby Treadway21 » Sun Oct 10, 2010 12:23 pm

SmooBoy wrote:The referee sounded like 20's Reporter Guy. "It was holding, seeee!"

I thought the exact same thing or maybe Llowel Thomas - very funny.
Image
An atheist is a guy who watches a Notre Dame-SMU football game and
doesn't care who wins.
-- Dwight D. Eisenhower
User avatar
Treadway21
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 6586
Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2004 2:14 pm
Location: Dallas, TX


Return to Football

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests