PonyFans.comBoard IndexAround the HilltopFootballRecruitingBasketballOther Sports

SMU Receivers in Losses

This is the forum for talk about SMU Football

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

SMU Receivers in Losses

Postby Stallion » Mon Nov 08, 2010 2:12 pm

although they have run up some big numbers against some weak pass defenses(SMU has played the 3 worst pass defenses statistically in the NCAA)-what has Padron and these receivers done in games where we lost. Not very impressive:

Darrius Johnson 30 Catches 296 yards 9.9 yards per catch
Cole Beasley 30 Catches for 270 yards 9.0 yards per catch
Bradley Haynes 22 Catches for 199 yards 9.0 yards per catch

Aldrick Robinson is a home run threat and is a playmaker-his stats are pretty good:

26 Catches for 394 yards 15+ yards per catches.

9-10 yards ain't going to get it done. Basically 3 possession receivers in those games. Most defenses will give SMU's Run N Shoot the short passes all day long. We need to be more consistent in hitting the 2nd and 3rd level and making plays after catch to beat the better teams on our schedule.
"With a quarter of a tank of gas, we can get everything we need right here in DFW." -SMU Head Coach Chad Morris

When momentum starts rolling downhill in recruiting-WATCH OUT.
Stallion
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 44302
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2000 4:01 am
Location: Dallas,Texas,USA

Re: SMU Receivers in Losses

Postby ponyboy » Mon Nov 08, 2010 2:32 pm

How are anyone else's receivers doing in losses?
ponyboy
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 15134
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2000 4:01 am
Location: University Park,TX US

Re: SMU Receivers in Losses

Postby Donnell88 » Mon Nov 08, 2010 10:57 pm

I'm also tired of all this dinking and dunking with very little Yards After Catch.
And, it drives me nuts when SMU is second and short, then Padron throws two incompletions.
We're allowed to run the ball now and then, especially when Zach Line is having an all-conference
season.
Donnell88
All-American
 
Posts: 548
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2008 8:51 pm
Location: Vancouver, B.C.

Re: SMU Receivers in Losses

Postby kull » Tue Nov 09, 2010 7:08 am

1) drops from recievers
2) footwork/ball placement from Padron
ImageImageImage
User avatar
kull
Heisman
 
Posts: 1208
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 10:20 pm
Location: Georgia

Re: SMU Receivers in Losses

Postby ponyscott » Tue Nov 09, 2010 9:48 am

kull wrote:1) drops from recievers
2) footwork/ball placement from Padron



3) Ball/pass pump fakes from Padron to freeze defenders
4) Head fakes from Padron to freeze defenders
5) Check off on several recievers instead of looking at first option and then throwing it to first option
User avatar
ponyscott
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 7033
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 12:47 pm

Re: SMU Receivers in Losses

Postby RGV Pony » Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:13 am

ponyscott wrote:
kull wrote:1) drops from recievers
2) footwork/ball placement from Padron



3) Ball/pass pump fakes from Padron to freeze defenders
4) Head fakes from Padron to freeze defenders
5) Check off on several recievers instead of looking at first option and then throwing it to first option


6) no stupid false starts, clipping, etc
User avatar
RGV Pony
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 17269
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Dallas

Re: SMU Receivers in Losses

Postby argyle hoss » Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:54 am

I believe the receivers have lost their legs because of the need for backups and the continuous running of routes.. This week off should give us our legs back and give them the edge they need to be sharp...Only time will tell. This is why I believe when guys run long routes, a replace for a play or so will keep us sharp in our cuts...Some teams have complete units they exchange after long routes. I think we will see better routes run with crispness and more energy after a week off. I believe teams get into trouble by not using backups during games especially when a player goes down and the relief has to step in. This also includes more players in the action which builds team morale. Another class will give us more quality depth with more size and speed. It will come together with time...Go Mustangs!!!
argyle hoss
Recruit
 
Posts: 26
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2010 8:58 am

Re: SMU Receivers in Losses

Postby Dukster » Tue Nov 09, 2010 11:29 pm

ponyscott wrote:
kull wrote:1) drops from recievers
2) footwork/ball placement from Padron



3) Ball/pass pump fakes from Padron to freeze defenders
4) Head fakes from Padron to freeze defenders
5) Check off on several recievers instead of looking at first option and then throwing it to first option


Hey PS: you must think Kp is on the basketball team. Head fake, pump, do you want him to dribble behind his back too? You might want to start showing up and hear what JJ says at the luncheons. He tells you who the QB is looking at while he's making his reads. You do realize the Qb is reading the defender? The DB's reaction tells the Qb where to throw. I hope the QB doesn't get caught in the lane more than 3 seconds doing all that pumping and head faking. Oops, wrong sport again. :mrgreen:
Dukster
Junior Varsity
 
Posts: 205
Joined: Sun Dec 13, 2009 12:52 am


Return to Football

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AusTxPony and 8 guests