I have no complaints with the play of the receivers. Yes there were a couple bad drops, but there were plenty more good catches on very poorly thrown balls.
Not the problem.
|
Lighting could have been a problem for the WR'sModerators: PonyPride, SmooPower
36 posts
• Page 3 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Re: Lighting could have been a problem for the WR'sI have no complaints with the play of the receivers. Yes there were a couple bad drops, but there were plenty more good catches on very poorly thrown balls.
Not the problem.
Re: Lighting could have been a problem for the WR'sThank you! Finally, someone points out all the acrobatic catches that WERE caught instead of the two or three that were not.
Re: Lighting could have been a problem for the WR'sI also found it strange that he said that he noticed and mentioned that the lights were a problem when he got here three years ago. If so, why are they still the way they are? It is pretty dang clear he has the support he needs to get things done, so if this was a priority why hasn't it been taken on yet? I can't imagine in the priority list of to-do's, this would have been a high cost, long-time thing to handle.
"I don't think anyone around the country has any idea how good we are going to be." - Coach Justin Stepp
GO MUSTANGS!!!!
Re: Lighting could have been a problem for the WR'sMentioned same thing on my post. This is such a BS thing for him to mention it is laughable.
Re: Lighting could have been a problem for the WR'sThe only lights that weren't on was the team's. Saw them do the "walk" and they looked uninterested, unenthusiatic and bored. Too much of let down from the big A&M game? The team just didn't look inspired to me. Anyone else have an opinion?
36 posts
• Page 3 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests |
|