PonyFans.comBoard IndexAround the HilltopFootballRecruitingBasketballOther Sports

The Bottom Line is...

This is the forum for talk about SMU Football

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

The Bottom Line is...

Postby GoRedGoBlue » Sun Oct 31, 2004 7:56 pm

...and I preface this with a big caveat of this team REALLY is young...but,

Shumann had us in the top40 in Defenses playing in the pass happy WAC (big and small) consistently, with (very) arguably less talent.

Moreover, Shumann dominated option teams (Navy, Rice, AFA, etc.). Bennett has shown that he cannot scheme to defend the option in 3 years year.

I still give him next year, unless we get blown out by the next three games, we gotta win 2 to have any shot of decent recruiting.

Otherwise, call Todd Dodge and let him have it. He'd have 2-3 years of HS name recognition, pull some of the best Area talent (the 200 mile radius theory is still in play), and fire up what should be some maturing talent. I am not a fan of the HS to Div-1a move (especially since we are S-M-U and not UNT), but what other options do we have if it comes to that?

I really do think that NEXT year, we HAVE to have a 6'2" JUCO WR burner to complement our WRs, plus a 6-footer, or else this offense is destined to fizzle.
GoRedGoBlue
Heisman
 
Posts: 1527
Joined: Tue May 06, 2003 3:01 am
Location: dallas,tx,usa

Postby Charleston Pony » Sun Oct 31, 2004 8:21 pm

I wouldn't say Shumann was working with less talent. I seem to recall a couple of DBs on NFL rosters (Rhinehart, Turner, Garrett) and I can recall when we had two senior DTs tipping the scales close to 300 lbs (Croy and Post), Kevin Aldridge and Luke Johnson applying pressure from the outside, Vic Viloria achoring the middle of the defense, etc... Shumann was a good coach, but let's not make him out to be a miracle worker. While coaching makes a difference, the team with the most talent will still win 80-90% of the time.
Charleston Pony
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 28922
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2000 3:01 am
Location: Stonebridge Golf Club, NC

Postby PK » Sun Oct 31, 2004 8:30 pm

Shumann was good at adapting his schemes to the talent he had. I don't think Bennett has ever had to do that. He has tried to get the talent we have play his schemes. To some extent that has merit in that when the talent matures to the level necessary to play his defensive schemes, they will be well versed in them, the down side is that the wait is excruciating. Bennett's defenses have been very good at other places, but as Stallion will point out, he had the luxury of loading up with older JUCO talent and players that would probably never make it here academically.
User avatar
PK
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 8805
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2000 3:01 am
Location: Dallas, Texas 75206

Re:

Postby GoRedGoBlue » Sun Oct 31, 2004 10:36 pm

Charleston Pony wrote:I wouldn't say Shumann was working with less talent. I seem to recall a couple of DBs on NFL rosters (Rhinehart, Turner, Garrett) and I can recall when we had two senior DTs tipping the scales close to 300 lbs (Croy and Post), Kevin Aldridge and Luke Johnson applying pressure from the outside, Vic Viloria achoring the middle of the defense, etc... Shumann was a good coach, but let's not make him out to be a miracle worker. While coaching makes a difference, the team with the most talent will still win 80-90% of the time.


I agree with your post, however, don't judge Shumann's TALENT based upon what they did vs. what these guys have done...compare the relative recruiting strenghts ...and Bennett's are > than Shumann's (though younger, which is why I have a BIG caveat to allow these guys 2-3 more years).
GoRedGoBlue
Heisman
 
Posts: 1527
Joined: Tue May 06, 2003 3:01 am
Location: dallas,tx,usa


Return to Football

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 4 guests