Stallion wrote:Your right someone is in deep denial-the next time 1 school gets on probation 4 times in 10 years and then lies directly to the NCAA and has a Chairman of the Board of Govenors, President of the University and AD agree to continue to meet its payroll to recruits bought by an organized and ratified slush fund then come talk to me. Otherwise stop making a fool of yourself because you lack the skills of reason and judgment. No school has "done the same or worse" in the context of the legal standard of lack of institutional control. Your argument is facial invalid. The SMU case wa a SLAM-DUNK to anyone that can read, weigh and analyze evidence and legal standards of due process.
Agreed. SMU was ripe for punishment. Poor leadership at the top. SMU had it in spades.
In an odd twist, the "gov" left vast sums of money to UT upon his death. He had promised so much more to SMU than he ever gave.
