|
PonyFans.com •
Board Index •
Around the Hilltop •
Football •
Recruiting •
Basketball •
Other Sports
This is the forum for talk about SMU Football
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
by George S. Patton » Tue Dec 02, 2008 11:38 am
In this report, it states Washington has spoken twice with TCU coach Gary Patterson.
With Tennessee and Clemson gone, this is really the last of the premier jobs available. I don't think Notre Dame will make a change because if the AD and Charlie Weis aren't meeting until next Monday, the school would hang itself in recruiting. Just my opinion.
As for Patterson and Washington, iit's the sleeping giant in the PAC 10 because of what Don James did. If it gets the right direction, then the Huskies will be tough to beat.
If you're Patterson, you look at that job.
http://collegefootball.rivals.com/conte ... CID=884022
-
George S. Patton
-
by EmeraldCityPony » Tue Dec 02, 2008 1:33 pm
Washington has not been looking at Patterson. My prediction is that Jim Mora will be announced the next head coach soon - probably Monday after the Cal game.
It's a crappy job but someone's gotta do it.
-

EmeraldCityPony

-
- Posts: 578
- Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2002 3:01 am
- Location: Seattle, WA
by George S. Patton » Tue Dec 02, 2008 2:31 pm
EmeraldCityPony wrote:Washington has not been looking at Patterson. My prediction is that Jim Mora will be announced the next head coach soon - probably Monday after the Cal game.
So you're saying the reporter who wrote this story is wrong? I forgot about the Jim Mora angle because he was being connected to it when he was coaching Atlanta and Washington went with Willingham.
-
George S. Patton
-
by Peruna_Ate_My_Rolex » Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:00 pm
EmeraldCityPony wrote:Washington has not been looking at Patterson. My prediction is that Jim Mora will be announced the next head coach soon - probably Monday after the Cal game.
Problem is that Jim Mora is the "head coach in waiting" in Seattle when Holmgren hangs it up this year.
-

Peruna_Ate_My_Rolex

-
- Posts: 2914
- Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 3:01 am
- Location: Dallas,Texas,USA
by Corp » Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:02 pm
As painful as it may be, it's time to accept the inevitable...
Patterson isn't going anywhere. 
-
Corp

-
- Posts: 402
- Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2004 6:18 pm
by ReedFrawg » Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:04 pm
George S. Patton wrote:So you're saying the reporter who wrote this story is wrong? I forgot about the Jim Mora angle because he was being connected to it when he was coaching Atlanta and Washington went with Willingham.
Yea because those rivals reporters are so incredibly accurate in their reporting? See K State. Not saying it isn't true but I do think it's reasonable to questions these "media outlets".
-
ReedFrawg

-
- Posts: 1936
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Fort Worth, TX, US
by mrydel » Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:09 pm
It would be my guess that UW did contact Patterson. With the current pressure to interview a diverse selection of possible coaches, he would satisfy the fat, high waist, and wedgie categories. Does not mean they are interested.
All those who believe in psycho kinesis, raise my hand
-

mrydel

-
- Posts: 32035
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Sherwood,AR,USA
by ReedFrawg » Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:12 pm
mrydel wrote:It would be my guess that UW did contact Patterson. With the current pressure to interview a diverse selection of possible coaches, he would satisfy the fat, high waist, and wedgie categories. Does not mean they are interested.
Don't forget "proven winner". 
-
ReedFrawg

-
- Posts: 1936
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Fort Worth, TX, US
by smupony94 » Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:13 pm
ReedFrawg wrote:mrydel wrote:It would be my guess that UW did contact Patterson. With the current pressure to interview a diverse selection of possible coaches, he would satisfy the fat, high waist, and wedgie categories. Does not mean they are interested.
Don't forget "proven winner". 
Damn, you had to throw that in
-

smupony94

-
- Posts: 25665
- Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 11:34 am
- Location: Bee Cave, Texas
by ReedFrawg » Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:14 pm
smupony94 wrote:ReedFrawg wrote:mrydel wrote:It would be my guess that UW did contact Patterson. With the current pressure to interview a diverse selection of possible coaches, he would satisfy the fat, high waist, and wedgie categories. Does not mean they are interested.
Don't forget "proven winner". 
Damn, you had to throw that in
Well, that was a good line by mrydel so I had to go on the defensive....
-
ReedFrawg

-
- Posts: 1936
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Fort Worth, TX, US
by George S. Patton » Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:15 pm
I think this is a little different because Tom Dienhart is a national reporter who has been covering college football for many years. He used to write for The Sporting News.
He's pretty well connected nationally like Pat Forde and Ivan Maisel.
As for the K-State thing, sometimes on those local sites you have inexperienced cheerleading types of reporters who have a poor collection of sources who wind up not being in the loop. I would suspect that's what happened with Patterson.
Like I said before, unless Texas, USC or Florida come calling, Patterson isn't leaving because he has it too good over there.
But there's nothing wrong with him looking at Washington. I think he would do himself a disservice if he didn't. Looking at it and actually taking it are two different things.
However, as the story states, Fresno's Pat Hill appears to have the inside track.
-
George S. Patton
-
by ReedFrawg » Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:20 pm
Maybe a good time for Pat Hill to move on. Fresno has digressed the last couple years - at least relative to the standard they had established.
-
ReedFrawg

-
- Posts: 1936
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Fort Worth, TX, US
by mrydel » Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:20 pm
ReedFrawg wrote:mrydel wrote:It would be my guess that UW did contact Patterson. With the current pressure to interview a diverse selection of possible coaches, he would satisfy the fat, high waist, and wedgie categories. Does not mean they are interested.
Don't forget "proven winner". 
I admire his defensive coaching skills very much. And someone over there knows how to recruit.
All those who believe in psycho kinesis, raise my hand
-

mrydel

-
- Posts: 32035
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Sherwood,AR,USA
by jtstang » Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:47 pm
ReedFrawg wrote:smupony94 wrote:ReedFrawg wrote:mrydel wrote:It would be my guess that UW did contact Patterson. With the current pressure to interview a diverse selection of possible coaches, he would satisfy the fat, high waist, and wedgie categories. Does not mean they are interested.
Don't forget "proven winner". 
Damn, you had to throw that in
Well, that was a good line by mrydel so I had to go on the defensive....
Were you defending Patterson or the fat, high-waisted and wedgied in general? If the latter, we thank you.
I'd kill for a Nobel Peace Prize.
-

jtstang

-
- Posts: 11161
- Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2004 10:21 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
by PoconoPony » Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:48 pm
Washington fans really want to get back to the Don James days in a hurry. Biggest problem for anyone taking the job is the recruiting angle. Washington, Oregon, Idaho are not states that provide many Div I calibur players. Who ever takes the job needs to have excellent S. California and Texas recruiting connections and then hope all official visits do not occur on one of the 278 days a year of overcast and rain. Patterson has some of those connections.
-
PoconoPony

-
- Posts: 4436
- Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:01 pm
- Location: Nesquehoning, Pennsylvania
Return to Football
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests
|
|