SMU to play Washington St

by **03Mustang** » Mon Jan 05, 2009 10:00 am

Credit to the great mrydel for mentioning this on another thread

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/cougars/3 ... oug05.html

Sept 19, in Pullman, WA - I guess this is a good D-1A opponent to sign...I mean, technically they were as bad as us last year, right?

I still think it's weird that they are playing Notre Dame in San Antonio.

by **smupony94** » Mon Jan 05, 2009 10:06 am

I think I will have to make that road trip

by **LA_Mustang** » Mon Jan 05, 2009 10:06 am

might be our best chance for a d-1a win

by **George S. Patton** » Mon Jan 05, 2009 10:07 am

Story reads as if we have to figure something out for 2010. It didn't mention Washington St. coming to Dallas for the return game.

It would be kind of cool to play somebody from the Pac 10. I don't think we've played a Pac 10 opponent since 1998(?) at UCLA in the Rose Bowl, a 17-10 loss -- I believe.

by **EmeraldCityPony** » Mon Jan 05, 2009 10:08 am

Fantastic chance to play a beatable team from a BCS conference. I only hope that I will be back in Seattle by then so that I can make the trip.

by **RednBlue11** » Mon Jan 05, 2009 10:49 am

"The Raspberry Bowl"

by **ozfan** » Mon Jan 05, 2009 11:32 am

smupony94 wrote:I think I will have to make that road trip

I spent a year in Pullman one week, have fun.

by **RednBlue11** » Mon Jan 05, 2009 11:34 am

ozfan wrote:
smupony94 wrote:I think I will have to make that road trip

I spent a year in Pullman one week, have fun.

haha

by **SMUtrojanFAN** » Mon Jan 05, 2009 11:41 am

LA_Mustang wrote:might be our best chance for a d-1a win

They're probably saying the same thing about us.

by **smupony94** » Mon Jan 05, 2009 11:42 am

SMUtrojanFAN wrote:
LA_Mustang wrote:might be our best chance for a d-1a win

They're probably saying the same thing about us.

They are

by **RednBlue11** » Mon Jan 05, 2009 11:43 am

smupony94 wrote:
SMUtrojanFAN wrote:
LA_Mustang wrote:might be our best chance for a d-1a win

They're probably saying the same thing about us.

They are

show me

by **huskerpony** » Mon Jan 05, 2009 11:47 am

Nice! I like this.

Chance for a 2-0 start! Plus, we get Navy at home the week after TCU. Not saying we'll win that one, but we have a better shot at home.....and perhaps have some confidence again if we pull off the win over a Pac-10 team.

3-1 would be really nice........Ok. I might be going a little overboard.

by **RednBlue11** » Mon Jan 05, 2009 11:47 am

huskerpony wrote:Nice! I like this.

Chance for a 2-0 start! Plus, we get Navy at home the week after TCU. Not saying we'll win that one, but we have a better shot at home.....and perhaps have some confidence again if we pull off the win over a Pac-10 team.

3-1 would be really nice........Ok. I might be going a little overboard.

yes you are

by **CalallenStang** » Mon Jan 05, 2009 12:14 pm

huskerpony wrote:Chance for a 2-0 start! Plus, we get Navy at home the week after TCU. Not saying we'll win that one, but we have a better shot at home.....and perhaps have some confidence again if we pull off the win over a Pac-10 team.

Yeah, we will have a better shot at Navy if their third-string QB isn't running it every play against a hopelessly lost defense.

by **03Mustang** » Mon Jan 05, 2009 12:36 pm

RednBlue11 wrote:
huskerpony wrote:Nice! I like this.

Chance for a 2-0 start! Plus, we get Navy at home the week after TCU. Not saying we'll win that one, but we have a better shot at home.....and perhaps have some confidence again if we pull off the win over a Pac-10 team.

3-1 would be really nice........Ok. I might be going a little overboard.

yes you are

Yeah, no kidding. At this point I'd be happy with 3 wins next year...anything more than that would be icing on the cake. I think we're at best 2 years from being really competitive - largely due to our D.

SMU to play Washington St

SMU to play Washington St

Who is online