|
PonyFans.com •
Board Index •
Around the Hilltop •
Football •
Recruiting •
Basketball •
Other Sports
This is the forum for talk about SMU Football
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
by Mustangs35SMU » Sat Oct 22, 2005 3:31 pm
Might as well. You get it you're up by 7 you don't..well you're still tied and you get the ball to start the 2nd half.
2 Seconds left in the half. SMU at the 45 yard line of Tulsa. 4th and 5.
And here we go. And Romo Fumbles it..
But they called it down. They [deleted] dead. Can't be reviewed. Thank God.
End of the 1st Half.
Your SMU Mustangs: 10
The Tulsa Golden Hurricane: 10
-

Mustangs35SMU

-
- Posts: 13007
- Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2002 3:01 am
- Location: Garland, TX
-
by smupony94 » Sat Oct 22, 2005 3:32 pm
Scary way to end the half
-

smupony94

-
- Posts: 25665
- Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 11:34 am
- Location: Bee Cave, Texas
by Mustangs35SMU » Sat Oct 22, 2005 3:32 pm
The play was ruled dead as he was down.
Thats the only reason you don't do that play with 2 seconds left. Bennett is PO'ED! Why I don't know but he is.
10-10 at the end of the 1st half.
-

Mustangs35SMU

-
- Posts: 13007
- Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2002 3:01 am
- Location: Garland, TX
-
by RGV Pony » Sat Oct 22, 2005 3:32 pm
With a left-handed QB, the most important OL position is the right tackle. See what happens when that position breaks down.
For what reason is PB screaming BS at halftime? I would've thought he'd be thanking the officials for calling the ball down.
-

RGV Pony

-
- Posts: 17269
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Dallas
by smupony94 » Sat Oct 22, 2005 3:32 pm
Bennett just told the ref he is full of bull***
-

smupony94

-
- Posts: 25665
- Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 11:34 am
- Location: Bee Cave, Texas
by mrydel » Sat Oct 22, 2005 3:33 pm
That was a fumble and a touchdown Tulsa. But as with Marshall non reviewable. Maybe not a full payback but a payback for Marshall none the less.
-

mrydel

-
- Posts: 32035
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Sherwood,AR,USA
by Stallion » Sat Oct 22, 2005 3:36 pm
people keep saying if the ball touches the ground the man is down-I don't believe that is true because no fumble could ever be returned. Not sure if another part of his body was down though.
-
Stallion

-
- Posts: 44302
- Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2000 4:01 am
- Location: Dallas,Texas,USA
by Mustangs35SMU » Sat Oct 22, 2005 3:38 pm
mrydel wrote:That was a fumble and a touchdown Tulsa. But as with Marshall non reviewable. Maybe not a full payback but a payback for Marshall none the less.
The fumble was caused BY the ground..Hence why he was down.
But just like the Marshall game, it can't be reviewed.
-

Mustangs35SMU

-
- Posts: 13007
- Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2002 3:01 am
- Location: Garland, TX
-
by mrydel » Sat Oct 22, 2005 3:38 pm
It looked to me that he was still flying thru the air when he stuck the ball out and lost it. Obviously the ball hitting the ground is not down if you recall last week with ECU or more so Clint Stoener with Arkansas Vs. Tennessee a few years back when TU eventually won the National Championship.
-

mrydel

-
- Posts: 32035
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Sherwood,AR,USA
by mrydel » Sat Oct 22, 2005 3:40 pm
Mustangs35SMU wrote:mrydel wrote:That was a fumble and a touchdown Tulsa. But as with Marshall non reviewable. Maybe not a full payback but a payback for Marshall none the less.
The fumble was caused BY the ground..Hence why he was down. But just like the Marshall game, it can't be reviewed.
The ball touching the ground does NOT constitute down. If it does, explain the picture on the Ponyfans home page last week of the ECU QB.
-

mrydel

-
- Posts: 32035
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Sherwood,AR,USA
by Mustangs35SMU » Sat Oct 22, 2005 3:41 pm
Well Im just going off what the Tulsa announcers said.
They even agreed with the refs on it.
-

Mustangs35SMU

-
- Posts: 13007
- Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2002 3:01 am
- Location: Garland, TX
-
by smupony94 » Sat Oct 22, 2005 3:42 pm
CBS is scrolling scores and said we were still in the WAC
-

smupony94

-
- Posts: 25665
- Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 11:34 am
- Location: Bee Cave, Texas
by Stallion » Sat Oct 22, 2005 3:43 pm
man I just think a strong running attack with Martin getting the ball about 30 times would win this one-but what do I know. Tulsa looks porous on run defense.-but this damn offense cuts the damn availiable holes in third.. I would love to run right at that defense in an I formation
-
Stallion

-
- Posts: 44302
- Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2000 4:01 am
- Location: Dallas,Texas,USA
by mrydel » Sat Oct 22, 2005 3:43 pm
smupony94 wrote:CBS is scrolling scores and said we were still in the WAC
Check and see if Tulsa is too so we will know if it is a conference game.
-

mrydel

-
- Posts: 32035
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Sherwood,AR,USA
Return to Football
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests
|
|